Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

1985 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

EBRAHIM V CONTROLLER OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE
1985 (2) ZLR 1 (S)
S V ZVINOIRA
1985 (2) ZLR 9 (H)
ZENDERA V MCDADE & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 18 (H)
RB RANCHERS (PVT) LTD V ESTATE LATE MCLEAN & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 24 (H)
COMMERCIAL UNION FIRE, MARINE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD V FAWCETT SECURITY ORGANISATION BULAWAYO (PVT) LTD
1985 (2) ZLR 31 (S)
S V NDEBU & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 45 (S)
SUPIYA V MUTARE DISTRICT COUNCIL & ORS
1985 (2) ZLR 53 (H)
S V KURIMWI
1985 (2) ZLR 63 (S)
NCUBE & ANOR V WILEY & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 69 (H)
PARKER V PARKER & ORS
1985 (2) ZLR 79 (H)
S V MUTUME
1985 (2) ZLR 94 (H)
BARR V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
1985 (2) ZLR 97 (H)
S V DHLIWAYO & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 101 (S)
S V CHALUWA
1985 (2) ZLR 121 (S)
S V PAWENI & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 133 (S)
GRAIN MARKETING BOARD V BINGA GURU (PVT) LTD
1985 (2) ZLR 147 (H)
S V MUCHENJE
1985 (2) ZLR 154 (S)
J PAAR & CO (PVT) LTD V SHIELD OF ZIMBABWE INSURANCE CO LTD & ANOR
1985 (2) ZLR 160 (H)
S V MUPANDUKI
1985 (2) ZLR 169 (S)
BAECK V TINAGO
1985 (2) ZLR 177 (H)
HUGHES V LOTRIET
1985 (2) ZLR 179 (H)
GEORGIADIS & FLOREY BUILDING (PVT) LTD V BORROWDALE BUTCHERY (PVT) LTD
1985 (2) ZLR 188 (H)
S V JENKINS
1985 (2) ZLR 193 (S)
MADONDO V MKUSHI
1985 (2) ZLR 198 (S)
S V BENATAR
1985 (2) ZLR 205 (H)
S V MHARAPARA
1985 (2) ZLR 211 (S)
A V COMMISSIONER OF TAXES
1985 (2) ZLR 223 (H)
CHIBAYA V CHIBAYA
1985 (2) ZLR 237 (H)
MUZONDO V MUZONDO
1985 (2) ZLR 240 (S)
S V MATEKETA
1985 (2) ZLR 248 (S)
S V NDHLOVU & ORS
1985 (2) ZLR 261 (S)
MEMAN & ANOR V CONTROLLER OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE
1985 (2) ZLR 270 (H)
NCUBE V NDHLOVU
1985 (2) ZLR 281 (S)
S V MLALA
1985 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
CITY OF HARARE V PARSONS
1985 (2) ZLR 293 (S)
NATIONAL FOOD DISTRIBUTORS V WELTMAN
1985 (2) ZLR 310 (H)
WOLFENDEN V JACKSON
1985 (2) ZLR 313 (S)
STAMBOLIE & ANOR V NYAMUTAMBA TRANSPORT (PVT) LTD
1985 (2) ZLR 320 (H)
S V MUCHIMIKWA
1985 (2) ZLR 328 (S)
AGERE V NYAMBUYA
1985 (2) ZLR 336 (S)
S V MAKAMBA
1985 (2) ZLR 341 (S)
DULY & COMPANY LTD V SHONGE
1985 (2) ZLR 351 (S)
MAY & ORS V RESERVE BANK OF ZIMBABWE
1985 (2) ZLR 358 (S)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

RB RANCHERS (PVT) LTD v ESTATE LATE MCLEAN & ANOR 1985 (2) ZLR 24 (H) *

Case details
Citation
1985 (2) ZLR 24 (H)
Case No
Details not supplied
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Smith J
Heard
6 June, 1985
Judgment
4 July, 1985
Counsel
FC Blackie, SC for the applicant; R Y Phillips for the first respondent
Case Type
Civil Application
Annotations
Link to case annotations

Flynote

Contract — implied term of — that interest due on capital amount owing — circumstances when a court will imply a term in a contract.

Statutes — Bills of Exchange Act [Chapter 277] — ss 46(1)(a) and 56 — bill dishonoured by non-payment when duly presented for payment and payment refused and cannot be obtained — recovery of interest from party liable on the bill — withholding of interest if justice required that interest should be withheld — words to be given their plain meaning. E

Headnote

The court should be very slow to imply a term in a contract. The circumstances when a court will do so were considered by CENTLIVRES CJ in Mullin (Pty) Ltd v Benade Ltd 1952 (1) SA 211 (A). Section 46(1)(a) of the Bills of Exchange Act [Chapter 277] provides that a bill is dishonoured by non-payment when it is duly presented for payment and payment is refused or cannot be obtained. Section 56 of the Act provides for the measure of damages, which shall be liquidated damages, where a bill is dishonoured. In terms of para (a) thereof the holder may recover from any party liable on the bill the amount of the bill and interest thereon in accordance with any stipulation in the bill or from the time of presentment for payment if the bill is payable on demand, and the expenses of noting and of any protest. Paragraph (c) thereof provides, however, that interest recoverable in terms of the said para (a) may, if justice requires it, be withheld wholly or in part. A better approach in considering the withholding of interest if justice required that interest should be withheld would be to give the words used their plain meaning so as to include any method by which the bill was dishonoured, whether the failure to pay was excusable or inexcusable, and then to withhold interest only where justice so required. Section 56 of the Bills of Exchange Act [Chapter 277] deals only with the ordinary normal case where dishonour inevitably involves an inexcusable failure to pay at the proper time. If, however, s 56 should be given a wider meaning so as to apply to all cases where a cheque is dishonoured justice would require that interest be withheld in cases such as the present one, where the law prohibited the banker from meeting the cheque and thereafter the debt was paid in accordance with the provisions of the Administration of Estates Act [Chapter 301].

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.