Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2003 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V SITHOLE & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
BARKER V AFRICAN HOMESTEADS TOURING & SAFARIS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 6 (S)
AIR ZIMBABWE CORPORATION & ORS V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2003 (2) ZLR 11 (H)
MEDIX PHARMACIES (PVT) LTD & ORS V COMMISSIONER-GENERAL, ZRA & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 25 (H)
MACHEKA V MOYO
2003 (2) ZLR 49 (H)
MIKESOME INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V SILCOCKS INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2003 (2) ZLR 56 (H)
CHIZURA V CHIWESHE
2003 (2) ZLR 64 (H)
S V NYIRENDA
2003 (2) ZLR 70 (H)
BULAWAYO DIALOGUE INSTITUTE V MATYATYA NO & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 79 (H)
S V TSVANGIRAI & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 88 (H)
S V DANGAREMBWA
2003 (2) ZLR 97 (H)
S V NYATHI
2003 (2) ZLR 102 (H)
REGISTRAR-GENERAL V TSVANGIRAI
2003 (2) ZLR 110 (H)
MUREHWA SOUTH ELECTION PETITION
2003 (2) ZLR 123 (H)
S V KADEMAUNGA
2003 (2) ZLR 128 (H)
THE MUD-MAN ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD T-A BLUE CHIP AGENCIES V NECHIRONGA & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 131 (H)
LEADER TREAD ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V SMITH
2003 (1) ZLR 139 (H)
TINARWO V HOVE & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 148 (H)
SIBANDA V INDEPENDENCE GOLD MINING ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 155 (H)
MUGADZAHWETA V BANDA
2003 (2) ZLR 163 (H)
MKHANDLA V MUDZVITI & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 168 (H)
LALLEMAND V LALLEMAND
2003 (1) ZLR 178 (H)
S V MUREMBWE
2003 (2) ZLR 184 (H)
CITY OF HARARE V GWINDI
2003 (2) ZLR 188 (H)
BEAZLEY NO V KABELL & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 198 (S)
CHIRASASA & ORS V NHAMO NO & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 206 (S)
MATANDA & ORS V CMC PACKAGING (PVT) LTD & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 221 (H)
ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS OF ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V MADZINGO & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 225 (H)
VOLUNTEER FARMS (PVT) LTD V MPOFU & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 230 (H)
CAPITAL RADIO (PVT) LTD V BROADCASTING AUTHORITY OF ZIMBABWE & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 236 (S)
SOUTHDOWN HOLDINGS LTD V MARIWA
2003 (2) ZLR 318 (H)
MAWUTA V SEC FOR FINANCE
2003 (2) ZLR 323 (H)
VEHICLE DELIVERY SERVICES (ZIMBABWE) (PVT) LTD V GALAUN HOLDINGS LTD
2003 (2) ZLR 329 (H)
MACNEIL & ANOR V HASKINS
2003 (2) ZLR 334 (H)
MURINGANIZA V MUNYIKWA
2003 (2) ZLR 342 (H)
KAWONDE V DUN & BRADSTREET (PVT) LTD
2003 (2) ZLR 352 (H)
MASEDZA V GOSPEL OF GOD CHURCH
2003 (2) ZLR 359 (H)
DOS SANTOS V DE ANDRADE
2003 (2) ZLR 366 (H)
JIAWU MANUFACTURERS V MITCHELL COTTS FREIGHT ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD
2003 (2) ZLR 369 (H)
MAGOGÉ V ZIMNAT LION INSURANCE CO (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 382 (H)
EASTVIEW GARDENS RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION V ZIMBABWE REINSURANCE CORPORATION LTD & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 388 (H)
KYRIAKOS & KYRIAKOS V CHASI & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 399 (H)
S V BERE
2003 (2) ZLR 405 (H)
REDRIVER DEVELOPMENT (PVT) LTD V PROVENANCE SUPPORT CO
2003 (2) ZLR 412 (H)
WOODS V COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 421 (H)
BURDOCK INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V TIME BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 437 (H)
ZIMBABWE LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & ANOR V PRESIDENT OF ZIMBABWE & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 444 (H)
WOMEN AND LAW IN SOUTHERN AFRICA & ORS V MANDAZA & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 452 (H)
MUCHENJE V BATA SHOE COMPANY
2003 (2) ZLR 462 (S)
TAGARIRA BROS (PVT) LTD V LUNGA NO & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 465 (H)
BON ESPOIR (PVT) LTD V CHABATA & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 472 (S)
MGWACO FARM (PVT) LTD & ANOR V PASI & ORS
2003 (2) ZLR 478 (H)
INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES (PVT) LTD V COLSHOT INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2003 (2) ZLR 494 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

S V NYIRENDA 2003 (2) ZLR 70 (H)

Case details
Citation
2003 (2) ZLR 70 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HB-86-03
Court
High Court, Bulawayo
Judge
Chiweshe J & Ndou J
Heard
14 July 2007
Judgment
7 August 2007
Counsel
Ms A Masawi, for the appellant
L Masuku, for the respondent
Case Type
Criminal appeal
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Criminal procedure (sentence) - statutory offences - Sexual Offences Act c [Chapter 9:21] - s 3(1) - unlawful sexual relations with a minor factors to consider

Evidence — sexual cases — approach to — need to consider nature and circumstances of offence carefully — need for satisfactory explanation for unsatisfactory parts of complainant's conduct

Evidence - sexual cases - complaint - when admissible - reason why such evidence admitted

Headnote

The fact that a witness lied in some respects does not mean that the trier of fact has to disregard the witness's evidence in toto. The trier of fact is entitled to consider the witness's explanations for the unsatisfactory parts of his or her conduct. In a rape case, her testimony should be assessed on the basis that there is no standard reaction to a rape. Although the courts have moved away from the two-pronged "cautionary" test, the nature and circumstances of the alleged sexual offence must be considered carefully. Where the areas in respect of which the complainant moved away from the truth were areas fundamental to her story as a whole, it would be a serious misdirection for the magistrate to say that he finds the truth to lie somewhere else. In such a situation, the court does not find where the truth lies, it decides whether the witness on whose evidence the court is asked to rely is telling the truth.

Complaints in sexual cases are admitted to show consistency and to negative a defence of consent, but not as proof of their contents, nor to corroborate the, complainant. For the complaint to be admitted it must meet the following requirements: (a) it must have been made voluntarily and not as a result of questions of a leading and inducing or intimidating character; (b) it must have been made without undue delay but at the earliest opportunity which, under all the circumstances, could reasonably be expected, to the first person to whom the complaint could reasonably be expected to be made; and (c) the complainant must give evidence.

In a case of having unlawful sexual relations with a minor female, factors relevant to sentence include: (a) the age difference between the parties: the greater the difference, the more serious the offence; (b) the proximity of the minor to 16 years: the closer the minor is to 16, the less serious the offence; (c) whether the accused was in loco parentis; (d) whether the parties had any intention of marrying.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.