Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Appeal ” leave to appeal against decision of Labour Tribunal ” on question of law only
Employment ” dismissal ” employer's right to dismiss not removed by right to recover shortfall from employee
The applicant was dismissed from employment after a hearing by a labour relations officer found against him. His appeal to the Labour Relations Tribunal also failed. He then applied for late condonation of an appeal to the Supreme Court, as he wished to challenge the findings of fact by the Tribunal
Held, that an appeal from the Labour Relations Tribunal to the Supreme Court can be made only on a question of law, not on a question of fact
Held, further, that where an employee is dismissed for a shortfall, and the shortfall is recovered, the employer's general right to dismiss remains.
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.