Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Insolvency — liquidation — meeting — validity — provisional liquidator having publicised meeting before confirmation
The applicant was the successful bidder for the shares of the second respondent's company at a liquidation meeting convened by the Assistant Master in compliance with a court order. He then made an application for an order that the provisional liquidator (first respondent) or the second respondent transfer the shares, as this had not been done. The second respondent argued that the sale was not valid, as the provisional liquidator had not been confirmed when she publicised the meeting at which the bid was accepted by the creditors, thus the meeting was a nullity. ε Held, that the meeting was properly convened by the Assistant Master. The fact that the appointment of the provisional liquidator had not yet been confirmed when she caused the meeting to be publicised resulted in no prejudice to the second respondent and should not render the meeting a nullity. The sale, accepted by the creditors, was therefore valid, and the transfer was ordered.
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.