Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Appeal — criminal matter — distinction from review — appeal court confined to considering matters contained in record
Criminal procedure — review — distinction from appeal procedure — need to seek review, rather than appeal, when issues complained of do not appear ex facie the record
? The essential difference between review procedure and appeal procedure indicates that where the grievance is that the judgment or order of the magistrate is not justified by the evidence, and there is no need to go outside the record to ventilate the particular grievance, then the more appropriate procedure to follow for relief is by way of appeal. However, where issues are raised challenging the propriety of the proceedings of an inferior tribunal and facts, which have to be proved in order to support the issues, do not appear as established on the face of the record, proceedings should be by way of review.
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.