Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2011 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V MADZOKERE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
TRUSTCO MOBILE (PTY) LTD & ANOR V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ANOR (1)
2011 (2) ZLR 14 (H)
PIRORO V REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF CITIZENSHIP & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 26 (H)
S V MAPANZURE & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
S V CF (A JUVENILE)
2011 (2) ZLR 48 (H)
MUYAMBO V NGOMAIKARIRA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 51 (H)
BOWES & ORS V MANOLAKAKIS
2011 (2) ZLR 59 (H)
RECOY INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V TARCON (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 65 (H)
BUTAU V BUTAU
2011 (2) ZLR 74 (H)
MWI ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V RUWA TOWN COUNCIL & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 79 (H)
MANYANGE V MPOFU & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 87 (H)
DEPUTY SHERIFF, HARARE V ECOPLASTICS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 104 (H)
PAZVAKAVAMBWA V PORTCULLIS (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 112 (H)
STARAFRICA CORPORATION LTD V SIVNET INVSTMS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 123 (H)
ZHANDA & ANOR V T J GREAVES (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 131 (H)
RIO TINTO (AFRICA) PENSION FUND V GWARADZIMBA NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 140 (S)
MULEYA V MULEYA
2011 (2) ZLR 151 (H)
NYATHI & ANOR V NCUBE NO & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 156 (H)
TSODZAI V MAGEZA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 160 (H)
VON AHN V DZVANGAH NO & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 167 (H)
ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD V SARUCHERA NO
2011 (2) ZLR 178 (H)
MOYO & ORS V SIBANDA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 186 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA V DIOCESAN TRUSTEES, DIOCESE OF HARARE & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 193 (H)
BATSIRAI CHILDREN'S CARE V MINISTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 203 (H)
S V CHAWIRA
2011 (2) ZLR 210 (H)
MUCHINI V ADAMS & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 219 (H)
KHB ESTATES (PVT) LTD & ANOR V PAMBUKANI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 223 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA & ORS V JAKAZI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 231 (H)
CHIADZWA V COMMISSIONER-GENERAL OF POLICE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 241 (H)
S V MAGUYA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 248 (H)
S V MUBVUMBI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 251 (H)
TRUSTCO MOBILE (PTY) LTD & ANOR V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ANOR (2)
2011 (2) ZLR 258 (H)
GWERU TOURISM PROMOTIONS (PVT) LTD V SADLER & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 265 (H)
BHEBHE & ORS V CHAIRMAN, ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 274 (H)
S V KAWAREWARE
2011 (2) ZLR 281 (H)
IMARA EDWARDS SECURITY (PVT) LTD & ORS V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2011 (2) ZLR 292 (H)
POWER COACH EXPRESS (PVT) LTD V MARTIN MILLERS (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 300 (H)
TELECEL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2011 (2) ZLR 310 (H)
MAZUVA V SIMBI & ANOR; SIMBI V MAZUVA
2011 (2) ZLR 319 (H)
MURIMBA & ANOR V LAWS ORGANISATION (PVT) LTD & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 327 (H)
MUGABE V CHIUMBURU NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 336 (H)
SHAVA V BERGUS INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 340 (H)
MAVURUDZA & ANOR V MEIDLER POOLS & CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 346 (H)
S V T (A JUVENILE)
2011 (2) ZLR 350 (H)
PMA REAL EST AGENCY (PVT) LTD V ARDA
2011 (2) ZLR 355 (H)
MOYO V GWINDINGWI NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 368 (H)
ZAWAIRA V NYAMUPFUDZA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 375 (H)
BUBYE MINERALS (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF MINES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 384 (S)
KDB HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD V MEDICINES CONTROL AUTHORITY OF ZIMBABWE
2011 (2) ZLR 398 (S)
CHIROSWA MINERALS (PVT) LTD & ANOR V MINISTER OF MINES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 403 (H)
S V NYAMUKAPA
2011 (2) ZLR 417 (H)
CHIDAWU & ORS V SHAH & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 426 (H)
S V NYARUGWE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 432 (H)
SAMABAWAMEDZA V CHIYANGWA
2011 (2) ZLR 435 (H)
MAYISWA V MASTER & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 441 (H)
MVUDUDU V AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2011 (2) ZLR 449 (H)
CHINA SHOUGANG INTERNATIONAL V STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ZIMBABWE LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 456 (H)
PHIRI V NAWASHA
2011 (2) ZLR 464 (H)
CHIMHOWA & ORS V CHIMHOWA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 471 (H)
MASIYA & ANOR V SADOMBA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 478 (H)
WESTWOOD V MERCERS PROPERTY BROKERS
2011 (2) ZLR 491 (H)
CORISCO DESIGN TEAM V ZIMSUN ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 496 (H)
NJINI & ANOR V NGWENYA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 500 (H)
GIGA V ALBION PROPERTIES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 506 (H)
COCHRANE V MACKIE
2011 (2) ZLR 510 (H)
MEDA V HOMELINK (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 516 (H)
A-G V MABUSA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 522 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

MUYAMBO v NGOMAIKARIRA & ORS 2011 (2) ZLR 51 (H)

Case details
Citation
2011 (2) ZLR 51 (H)
Case No
Judgment HH-138-11
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Patel J
Heard
11 January 2011; 12 January 2011; CAV
Judgment
7 July 2011
Counsel
V Muza, for the plaintiff
B Kamanga, for the first, second, fifth & sixth defendants
Case Type
Civil trial
Annotations
Link to case annotations

Flynote

Delict — actio injuriarum — unlawful arrest and detention — when committed — presumption of animus injuriandi in event of illegal arrest or imprisonment — what defendant must show to establish lawful arrest

Headnote

The delict of unlawful arrest and detention is committed when a person, without lawful justification, restrains the liberty of another by arresting or imprisoning him. The plaintiff need only prove that the arrest or imprisonment was illegal and not that there was intention to act illegally or to cause harm. In our law, unlike South African law, animus injuriandi is presumed and, therefore, intention is not a requirement for this delict. Moreover, the use of force is not a prerequisite and neither is pecuniary loss. Damages can be awarded for any affront or humiliation stemming from the unlawful arrest and imprisonment of the plaintiff. Although this action is usually brought against members of the police or other uniformed force, a private individual can also be held liable for this delict committed against another private individual. In order to establish the lawfulness of an arrest without a warrant, the onus lies upon the defendant to show probable cause or reasonable suspicion. In exercising the power of arrest, he must act as an ordinary honest person would act, on suspicions which have a reasonable basis, and not merely on wild suspicion. In other words, the arrestor must act in such circumstances as would ordinarily lead a reasonable person to form the suspicion that the arrestee has committed an offence. It is not the function of the police to arrest at large and to use the interrogatory process in order to determine whom to charge. As regards damages for wrongful imprisonment, the deprivation of personal liberty is an odious interference and constitutes a serious infraction of fundamental rights, attracting an exemplary assessment of reparation. The longer and more oppressive the period of detention, the higher should be the quantum of damages.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.