Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2011 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V MADZOKERE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
TRUSTCO MOBILE (PTY) LTD & ANOR V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ANOR (1)
2011 (2) ZLR 14 (H)
PIRORO V REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF CITIZENSHIP & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 26 (H)
S V MAPANZURE & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
S V CF (A JUVENILE)
2011 (2) ZLR 48 (H)
MUYAMBO V NGOMAIKARIRA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 51 (H)
BOWES & ORS V MANOLAKAKIS
2011 (2) ZLR 59 (H)
RECOY INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V TARCON (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 65 (H)
BUTAU V BUTAU
2011 (2) ZLR 74 (H)
MWI ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V RUWA TOWN COUNCIL & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 79 (H)
MANYANGE V MPOFU & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 87 (H)
DEPUTY SHERIFF, HARARE V ECOPLASTICS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 104 (H)
PAZVAKAVAMBWA V PORTCULLIS (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 112 (H)
STARAFRICA CORPORATION LTD V SIVNET INVSTMS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 123 (H)
ZHANDA & ANOR V T J GREAVES (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 131 (H)
RIO TINTO (AFRICA) PENSION FUND V GWARADZIMBA NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 140 (S)
MULEYA V MULEYA
2011 (2) ZLR 151 (H)
NYATHI & ANOR V NCUBE NO & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 156 (H)
TSODZAI V MAGEZA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 160 (H)
VON AHN V DZVANGAH NO & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 167 (H)
ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD V SARUCHERA NO
2011 (2) ZLR 178 (H)
MOYO & ORS V SIBANDA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 186 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA V DIOCESAN TRUSTEES, DIOCESE OF HARARE & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 193 (H)
BATSIRAI CHILDREN'S CARE V MINISTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 203 (H)
S V CHAWIRA
2011 (2) ZLR 210 (H)
MUCHINI V ADAMS & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 219 (H)
KHB ESTATES (PVT) LTD & ANOR V PAMBUKANI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 223 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA & ORS V JAKAZI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 231 (H)
CHIADZWA V COMMISSIONER-GENERAL OF POLICE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 241 (H)
S V MAGUYA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 248 (H)
S V MUBVUMBI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 251 (H)
TRUSTCO MOBILE (PTY) LTD & ANOR V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ANOR (2)
2011 (2) ZLR 258 (H)
GWERU TOURISM PROMOTIONS (PVT) LTD V SADLER & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 265 (H)
BHEBHE & ORS V CHAIRMAN, ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 274 (H)
S V KAWAREWARE
2011 (2) ZLR 281 (H)
IMARA EDWARDS SECURITY (PVT) LTD & ORS V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2011 (2) ZLR 292 (H)
POWER COACH EXPRESS (PVT) LTD V MARTIN MILLERS (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 300 (H)
TELECEL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2011 (2) ZLR 310 (H)
MAZUVA V SIMBI & ANOR; SIMBI V MAZUVA
2011 (2) ZLR 319 (H)
MURIMBA & ANOR V LAWS ORGANISATION (PVT) LTD & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 327 (H)
MUGABE V CHIUMBURU NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 336 (H)
SHAVA V BERGUS INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 340 (H)
MAVURUDZA & ANOR V MEIDLER POOLS & CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 346 (H)
S V T (A JUVENILE)
2011 (2) ZLR 350 (H)
PMA REAL EST AGENCY (PVT) LTD V ARDA
2011 (2) ZLR 355 (H)
MOYO V GWINDINGWI NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 368 (H)
ZAWAIRA V NYAMUPFUDZA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 375 (H)
BUBYE MINERALS (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF MINES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 384 (S)
KDB HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD V MEDICINES CONTROL AUTHORITY OF ZIMBABWE
2011 (2) ZLR 398 (S)
CHIROSWA MINERALS (PVT) LTD & ANOR V MINISTER OF MINES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 403 (H)
S V NYAMUKAPA
2011 (2) ZLR 417 (H)
CHIDAWU & ORS V SHAH & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 426 (H)
S V NYARUGWE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 432 (H)
SAMABAWAMEDZA V CHIYANGWA
2011 (2) ZLR 435 (H)
MAYISWA V MASTER & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 441 (H)
MVUDUDU V AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2011 (2) ZLR 449 (H)
CHINA SHOUGANG INTERNATIONAL V STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ZIMBABWE LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 456 (H)
PHIRI V NAWASHA
2011 (2) ZLR 464 (H)
CHIMHOWA & ORS V CHIMHOWA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 471 (H)
MASIYA & ANOR V SADOMBA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 478 (H)
WESTWOOD V MERCERS PROPERTY BROKERS
2011 (2) ZLR 491 (H)
CORISCO DESIGN TEAM V ZIMSUN ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 496 (H)
NJINI & ANOR V NGWENYA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 500 (H)
GIGA V ALBION PROPERTIES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 506 (H)
COCHRANE V MACKIE
2011 (2) ZLR 510 (H)
MEDA V HOMELINK (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 516 (H)
A-G V MABUSA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 522 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

NYATHI & ANOR v NCUBE NO & ORS 2011 (2) ZLR 156 (H)

Case details
Citation
2011 (2) ZLR 156 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HB-123-11
Court
High Court, Bulawayo
Judge
Mathonsi J
Heard
6 September 2011; CAV
Judgment
15 September 2011
Counsel
L Nkomo , for the applicants
G Nyoni , for the respondents
Case Type
Civil application
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Succession — intestate — heirs ab intestato — deceased dying intestate — widow dying intestate thereafter but before deceased's estate wound up — intestate heirs to be ascertained at date when intestacy occurs — entitlement of widow's estate to inherit not erased by her death notwithstanding that her husband's deceased estate had not been wound up — Deceased Estates Succession Act [Chapter 6:02] — s 3A

Headnote

Intestate heirs are, in all cases, to be ascertained at the date when the intestacy occurs.

The applicants were the surviving children of the late DN who died intestate.At the time of his death he had been married to SN. She, however, survived him by only five months before she too died intestate. At the time of her death, she was the executrix dative of the estate of her late husband and had been in the process of winding up that estate, which included various immovable properties. After her death, the first applicant and the first respondent were appointed as joint executor and executrix dative respectively. A dispute, however, arose between them, concerning who was to benefit under the law of intestate succession. At the hearing, it was argued on behalf of the applicants that a deceased estate cannot inherit ab intestato and, therefore, the estate of SN was incapable of inheriting from the estate of the late DN. The respondents, however, placed reliance upon s 3A of the Deceased Estates Succession Act [Chapter 6:02] and submitted that the intestacy of DN occurred as at the date of his death, and not at any subsequent date, and that, in terms of provisions of the Act, SN did inherit from his husband's estate.

Held that the respondent's argument was correct. Upon the death of DN, his widow, SN, became entitled, in terms of the Deceased Estates Succession Act Act to inherit. This entitlement could not be wiped out by her death, five months after the death of DN, so as to allow the applicants to inherit from their father's estate as if SN had pre-deceased him.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.