Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2011 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V MADZOKERE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
TRUSTCO MOBILE (PTY) LTD & ANOR V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ANOR (1)
2011 (2) ZLR 14 (H)
PIRORO V REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF CITIZENSHIP & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 26 (H)
S V MAPANZURE & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
S V CF (A JUVENILE)
2011 (2) ZLR 48 (H)
MUYAMBO V NGOMAIKARIRA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 51 (H)
BOWES & ORS V MANOLAKAKIS
2011 (2) ZLR 59 (H)
RECOY INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V TARCON (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 65 (H)
BUTAU V BUTAU
2011 (2) ZLR 74 (H)
MWI ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V RUWA TOWN COUNCIL & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 79 (H)
MANYANGE V MPOFU & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 87 (H)
DEPUTY SHERIFF, HARARE V ECOPLASTICS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 104 (H)
PAZVAKAVAMBWA V PORTCULLIS (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 112 (H)
STARAFRICA CORPORATION LTD V SIVNET INVSTMS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 123 (H)
ZHANDA & ANOR V T J GREAVES (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 131 (H)
RIO TINTO (AFRICA) PENSION FUND V GWARADZIMBA NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 140 (S)
MULEYA V MULEYA
2011 (2) ZLR 151 (H)
NYATHI & ANOR V NCUBE NO & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 156 (H)
TSODZAI V MAGEZA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 160 (H)
VON AHN V DZVANGAH NO & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 167 (H)
ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD V SARUCHERA NO
2011 (2) ZLR 178 (H)
MOYO & ORS V SIBANDA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 186 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA V DIOCESAN TRUSTEES, DIOCESE OF HARARE & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 193 (H)
BATSIRAI CHILDREN'S CARE V MINISTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 203 (H)
S V CHAWIRA
2011 (2) ZLR 210 (H)
MUCHINI V ADAMS & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 219 (H)
KHB ESTATES (PVT) LTD & ANOR V PAMBUKANI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 223 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA & ORS V JAKAZI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 231 (H)
CHIADZWA V COMMISSIONER-GENERAL OF POLICE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 241 (H)
S V MAGUYA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 248 (H)
S V MUBVUMBI & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 251 (H)
TRUSTCO MOBILE (PTY) LTD & ANOR V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ANOR (2)
2011 (2) ZLR 258 (H)
GWERU TOURISM PROMOTIONS (PVT) LTD V SADLER & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 265 (H)
BHEBHE & ORS V CHAIRMAN, ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 274 (H)
S V KAWAREWARE
2011 (2) ZLR 281 (H)
IMARA EDWARDS SECURITY (PVT) LTD & ORS V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2011 (2) ZLR 292 (H)
POWER COACH EXPRESS (PVT) LTD V MARTIN MILLERS (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 300 (H)
TELECEL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2011 (2) ZLR 310 (H)
MAZUVA V SIMBI & ANOR; SIMBI V MAZUVA
2011 (2) ZLR 319 (H)
MURIMBA & ANOR V LAWS ORGANISATION (PVT) LTD & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 327 (H)
MUGABE V CHIUMBURU NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 336 (H)
SHAVA V BERGUS INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 340 (H)
MAVURUDZA & ANOR V MEIDLER POOLS & CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 346 (H)
S V T (A JUVENILE)
2011 (2) ZLR 350 (H)
PMA REAL EST AGENCY (PVT) LTD V ARDA
2011 (2) ZLR 355 (H)
MOYO V GWINDINGWI NO & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 368 (H)
ZAWAIRA V NYAMUPFUDZA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 375 (H)
BUBYE MINERALS (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF MINES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 384 (S)
KDB HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD V MEDICINES CONTROL AUTHORITY OF ZIMBABWE
2011 (2) ZLR 398 (S)
CHIROSWA MINERALS (PVT) LTD & ANOR V MINISTER OF MINES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 403 (H)
S V NYAMUKAPA
2011 (2) ZLR 417 (H)
CHIDAWU & ORS V SHAH & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 426 (H)
S V NYARUGWE & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 432 (H)
SAMABAWAMEDZA V CHIYANGWA
2011 (2) ZLR 435 (H)
MAYISWA V MASTER & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 441 (H)
MVUDUDU V AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2011 (2) ZLR 449 (H)
CHINA SHOUGANG INTERNATIONAL V STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ZIMBABWE LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 456 (H)
PHIRI V NAWASHA
2011 (2) ZLR 464 (H)
CHIMHOWA & ORS V CHIMHOWA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 471 (H)
MASIYA & ANOR V SADOMBA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 478 (H)
WESTWOOD V MERCERS PROPERTY BROKERS
2011 (2) ZLR 491 (H)
CORISCO DESIGN TEAM V ZIMSUN ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD
2011 (2) ZLR 496 (H)
NJINI & ANOR V NGWENYA & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 500 (H)
GIGA V ALBION PROPERTIES & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 506 (H)
COCHRANE V MACKIE
2011 (2) ZLR 510 (H)
MEDA V HOMELINK (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2011 (2) ZLR 516 (H)
A-G V MABUSA & ORS
2011 (2) ZLR 522 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

S v MAPANZURE & ANOR 2011 (2) ZLR 43 (H)

Case details
Citation
2011 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HH-141-11
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Kudya J
Heard
6 July 2011
Judgment
6 July 2011
Counsel
Details not supplied
Case Type
Criminal review
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

C Criminal procedure (sentence) “ offences under Criminal Law Code “ stock theft (s 114(2)(a)) “ penalties applicable “ mandatory minimum sentence in absence of special circumstances “ offence committed before mandatory minimum sentence introduced “ accused person convicted after penalty increased “ increased penalty not applicable

Headnote

The accused were convicted of stock theft, the offence having been committed before, but the convictions occurring after, an amendment to the Stock Theft Act [Chapter 9:18] came into operation in 2004. The Stock Theft Act itself was repealed by the Code in 2006, which re-enacted the provisions of that Act in s 114. That amendment had introduced a mandatory minimum sentence of imprisonment unless special circumstances were found. The magistrate based his various sentences on the assumption that the mandatory minimum sentence was applicable, having found no special circumstances to exist.

Held, that the general rule at common law is that statutes are not to operate retrospectively, unless it is expressly stated that an enactment shall be retrospective in its operation or it is a necessary implication from the language used. This was not the case here. If the legislature intended the section to have retroactive effect it would have expressly said so. It did not. After all, it was radically increasing the punishment for the theft of a bovine or equine animal. In addition, the legislature repeated the same wording which was held in a 1976 decision to have no retrospective effect. The legislature is assumed to have been aware of that decision when it promulgated the present section in identical terms.

Editor's note: this decision is in accordance not only with principle but also with s 18(5) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980, the relevant portion of which provides that "no penalty shall be imposed for any criminal offence that is severer in degree or description than the maximum penalty that might have been imposed for that offence at the time when it was committed" (emphasis supplied).

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.