Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2010 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V POWER COACH EXPRESS (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
S V WESTGATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2002 (1) ZLR 12 (H)
DHLAMINI & ANOR V CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 25 (H)
MASUKU V CHINYEMBA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 31 (H)
S V K (A JUVENILE)
2010 (2) ZLR 35 (H)
CHINANZVAVANA & ORS V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2010 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
DUMBURA V MUHWEHWESA & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 62 (H)
PASIPANODYA NO V RUWIZHI NO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 78 (H)
KATSANDE V KATSANDE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
SHAH V AIR ZIMBABWE CORPORATION
2010 (2) ZLR 94 (H)
TIISO HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD V ZISCO
2010 (2) ZLR 100 (H)
HARRISON & HUGHSON (PVT) LTD V ALSTOM ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 114 (H)
S V MATAPO & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 120 (H)
HARRIS V HARRIS
2010 (2) ZLR 127 (S)
TACHIONA & ANOR V RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
2010 (2) ZLR 140 (H)
MAPLANKA V B A NCUBE HOLDINGS
2010 (2) ZLR 146 (H)
HUNGWE & ANOR V MAWEREZA
2010 (2) ZLR 154 (H)
CEDOR PARK FARM (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF STATE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 158 (H)
ZIMASCO (PVT) LTD V MARIKANO
2010 (2) ZLR 167 (H)
CHANAKIRA V MAPFUMO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 178 (H)
MUGUGU V POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 185 (H)
MOYO & ANOR V HASSBRO PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 194 (H)
MAFUSIRE V GREYLING & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 198 (H)
MCCOSH V PIONEER CORPORATION AFRICA LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 211 (H)
MUDEKUNYE & ORS V MUDEKUNYE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 225 (H)
MEKI V VHUSHANGWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 237 (H)
PEACOCK V STEYN
2010 (2) ZLR 254 (H)
MOHAMED V NOORMAHOMED & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 260 (H)
WILLIAMS V KATSANDE & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 266 (H)
ZCTU V OC POLICE, KWEKWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 277 (H)
AEPROMM RESOURCES (PVT) LTD V MAZOWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 281 (H)
FIRST CLASS ENTERPRISES LTD V SCANLINK (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
LASAGNE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS V HIGHDON INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 296 (H)
MINISTER MINES & MINING DEVELOPMENT & ORS V AFRICAN CONSOL RESOURCES PLC & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 307 (H)
NYANDORO V MINISTER HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 332 (H)
SABLE CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD V EASTERBROOK
2010 (2) ZLR 342 (S)
MEREKI V FORRESTER EST (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 351 (H)
SAMUDZIMU V DAIRIBORD HOLDINGS LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 357 (H)
S V TIRIVANHU
2010 (2) ZLR 361 (H)
CHIKADAYA NO V CHENGA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 366 (H)
CEPRAT FARMING (PVT) LTD V BRIGHTLAND FARMING (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 383 (H)
MPOFU V COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 389 (H)
S V GARANEWAKO
2010 (2) ZLR 395 (H)
S V DUBE
2010 (2) ZLR 400 (H)
MABAIRE V JAILOSI & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 407 (H)
AGRICULTURAL BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V NICKSTATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 419 (H)
BRUFORD V ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 438 (H)
HUSAIHWVHU & ORS V UZ-USF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMME
2010 (2) ZLR 448 (H)
NGWENYA & ANOR V NDEBELE NO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 457 (H)
DUBE V OC ZRP, NKAYI DISTRICT, & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 462 (H)
VAN DEN BERG & ANOR V LANG
2010 (2) ZLR 469 (H)
MUSARIRI V MUTAVAYI & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 475 (H)
SIBANDA V GUMBO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 484 (H)
MUTYASIRA V GONYORA
2010 (2) ZLR 489 (H)
S V MASINA
2010 (2) ZLR 498 (H)
MUNHUMUTEMA V TAPAMBWA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 509 (H)
PECHI INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V NYAMUDA
2010 (2) ZLR 516 (H)
S V MUPATSI
2010 (2) ZLR 529 (H)
S V THOMPSON
2010 (2) ZLR 535 (H)
RITENOTE PRINTERS (PVT) LTD V ADAM AND CO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 544 (H)
WILLIAMS & ANOR V MSIPHA NO & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 552 (H)
COMMERCIAL FARMERS' UNION & ORS V MINISTER OF LANDS & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 576 (H)
TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V APPRECIATIVE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 598 (H)
VAN HOOGSTRATEN V JAMES & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 608 (H)
S V NKOMO
2010 (2) ZLR 613 (H)
GONDO & ORS V REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE
2010 (2) ZLR 618 (SADC)
TRUSTEES, LEONARD CHESHIRE HOMES ZIMBABWE CENTRAL TRUST V CHITE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 631 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

MUTYASIRA v GONYORA 2010 (2) ZLR 489 (H)

Case details
Citation
2010 (2) ZLR 489 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HH-218-10
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Chitakunye J
Heard
28 October 2010
Judgment
28 October 2010
Counsel
Details not supplied
Case Type
Referral in terms of r 313 of the High Court Rules
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Administration of estates - curator bonis - fees - currency in which fees payable - work done before advent of new currency system - estate not wound up until after new currency system in force - value of estate expressed in US dollars - fee expressed as percentage of value of estate - curator entitled to payment in US dollars

Headnote

D The applicant had been appointed curator bonis in litigation involving a deceased estate. His appointment was set aside and he demanded to be paid his fee for the work he had done. This work had been done before the multi-currency system had been implemented in Zimbabwe. E The respondent, who was the executor of the estate, contended that he could only be paid when the estate had been wound up. It was after the implementation of the multi-currency system that the respondent advertised the first interim administration and distribution account for the estate. The account was drawn up in United States dollars. The applicant subsequently submitted his bill for the work done. After a hearing, the taxing master determined that the applicant's fee should be 10 per cent of the value of the estate and that it should be paid in US dollars. The respondent argued that the fee should be based on Zimbabwe dollars, the currency prevailing at the time the work was done.

Held, that the applicant's entitlement to payment arose from s 96 of the G Administration of Estates Act [Chapter 6:01], under which he was entitled to receive out of the assets of the estate a reasonable compensation for his work in the administration of the estate, the amount to be assessed and taxed by the Master, subject to the review of the High Court. It was necessary for the applicant to wait until the respondent had lodged the account to have the Master assess and tax his fees. It was not possible to calculate the applicant's fees in Zimbabwean dollars when the executrix had used United States dollars. The respondent also claimed and was paid only in US dollars, even though some of her work had been done before the advent of the new currency system.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.