Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2010 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V POWER COACH EXPRESS (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
S V WESTGATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2002 (1) ZLR 12 (H)
DHLAMINI & ANOR V CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 25 (H)
MASUKU V CHINYEMBA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 31 (H)
S V K (A JUVENILE)
2010 (2) ZLR 35 (H)
CHINANZVAVANA & ORS V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2010 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
DUMBURA V MUHWEHWESA & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 62 (H)
PASIPANODYA NO V RUWIZHI NO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 78 (H)
KATSANDE V KATSANDE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
SHAH V AIR ZIMBABWE CORPORATION
2010 (2) ZLR 94 (H)
TIISO HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD V ZISCO
2010 (2) ZLR 100 (H)
HARRISON & HUGHSON (PVT) LTD V ALSTOM ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 114 (H)
S V MATAPO & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 120 (H)
HARRIS V HARRIS
2010 (2) ZLR 127 (S)
TACHIONA & ANOR V RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
2010 (2) ZLR 140 (H)
MAPLANKA V B A NCUBE HOLDINGS
2010 (2) ZLR 146 (H)
HUNGWE & ANOR V MAWEREZA
2010 (2) ZLR 154 (H)
CEDOR PARK FARM (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF STATE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 158 (H)
ZIMASCO (PVT) LTD V MARIKANO
2010 (2) ZLR 167 (H)
CHANAKIRA V MAPFUMO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 178 (H)
MUGUGU V POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 185 (H)
MOYO & ANOR V HASSBRO PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 194 (H)
MAFUSIRE V GREYLING & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 198 (H)
MCCOSH V PIONEER CORPORATION AFRICA LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 211 (H)
MUDEKUNYE & ORS V MUDEKUNYE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 225 (H)
MEKI V VHUSHANGWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 237 (H)
PEACOCK V STEYN
2010 (2) ZLR 254 (H)
MOHAMED V NOORMAHOMED & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 260 (H)
WILLIAMS V KATSANDE & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 266 (H)
ZCTU V OC POLICE, KWEKWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 277 (H)
AEPROMM RESOURCES (PVT) LTD V MAZOWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 281 (H)
FIRST CLASS ENTERPRISES LTD V SCANLINK (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
LASAGNE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS V HIGHDON INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 296 (H)
MINISTER MINES & MINING DEVELOPMENT & ORS V AFRICAN CONSOL RESOURCES PLC & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 307 (H)
NYANDORO V MINISTER HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 332 (H)
SABLE CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD V EASTERBROOK
2010 (2) ZLR 342 (S)
MEREKI V FORRESTER EST (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 351 (H)
SAMUDZIMU V DAIRIBORD HOLDINGS LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 357 (H)
S V TIRIVANHU
2010 (2) ZLR 361 (H)
CHIKADAYA NO V CHENGA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 366 (H)
CEPRAT FARMING (PVT) LTD V BRIGHTLAND FARMING (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 383 (H)
MPOFU V COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 389 (H)
S V GARANEWAKO
2010 (2) ZLR 395 (H)
S V DUBE
2010 (2) ZLR 400 (H)
MABAIRE V JAILOSI & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 407 (H)
AGRICULTURAL BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V NICKSTATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 419 (H)
BRUFORD V ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 438 (H)
HUSAIHWVHU & ORS V UZ-USF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMME
2010 (2) ZLR 448 (H)
NGWENYA & ANOR V NDEBELE NO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 457 (H)
DUBE V OC ZRP, NKAYI DISTRICT, & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 462 (H)
VAN DEN BERG & ANOR V LANG
2010 (2) ZLR 469 (H)
MUSARIRI V MUTAVAYI & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 475 (H)
SIBANDA V GUMBO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 484 (H)
MUTYASIRA V GONYORA
2010 (2) ZLR 489 (H)
S V MASINA
2010 (2) ZLR 498 (H)
MUNHUMUTEMA V TAPAMBWA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 509 (H)
PECHI INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V NYAMUDA
2010 (2) ZLR 516 (H)
S V MUPATSI
2010 (2) ZLR 529 (H)
S V THOMPSON
2010 (2) ZLR 535 (H)
RITENOTE PRINTERS (PVT) LTD V ADAM AND CO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 544 (H)
WILLIAMS & ANOR V MSIPHA NO & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 552 (H)
COMMERCIAL FARMERS' UNION & ORS V MINISTER OF LANDS & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 576 (H)
TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V APPRECIATIVE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 598 (H)
VAN HOOGSTRATEN V JAMES & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 608 (H)
S V NKOMO
2010 (2) ZLR 613 (H)
GONDO & ORS V REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE
2010 (2) ZLR 618 (SADC)
TRUSTEES, LEONARD CHESHIRE HOMES ZIMBABWE CENTRAL TRUST V CHITE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 631 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

MAPLANKA v B A NCUBE HOLDINGS 2010 (2) ZLR 146 (H)

Case details
Citation
2010 (2) ZLR 146 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HB-63-10
Court
High Court, Bulawayo
Judge
Ndou J
Heard
13 July 2009
Judgment
15 July 2010
Counsel
J Tshuma, for the plaintiff. S S Mazibisa, for the defendant.
Case Type
Civil trial
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Contract - interpretation - time - computation of - clause requiring rent to be paid "within 7 days of the due date" - meaning of - period of computation beginning on first day of period stated

Headnote

A lease agreement for a piece of land on which there was a filling station provided that the rent "shall be payable monthly in advance ... on or before the first day of each month." The subsequent clause provided that "In the event of the rent... being unpaid within seven days of the due date ... the owner shall be entitled at his option to cancel the lease forthwith". The lessee paid the rent for one month on the 8th of the following month, and the lessor sought to have the contract cancelled and the lessee evicted. The issue was whether the lessor was entitled to this remedy.

Held, that if the language used in the lease agreement is sufficiently clear in fixing the last day of payment, the court will give effect to the clear intention of the parties. On the other hand, if the language used in the lease is not sufficiently clear or explicit in fixing the last day of payment, the civil method of computation of time must be used, in which case the first day is included in, and the last day excluded from, the computation. "Within seven days of the due date" clearly means that payment is due within the first seven days of each month. The due date being the first day of the month, it follows that "within seven days" of that date must mean within a period of no more than seven days from due date, including the due date itself. In this respect the phrase "within seven days of due date" is clearly distinguishable and different from the phrase "within 15 days after the same should have become due". The phrase "within seven days of due date" suggests that counting starts from the due date

itself. Accordingly, the meaning of "within seven days of due date" is reasonably clear and it refers to the first seven days of the month, that is to say, up to midnight of the 7th day of each month. Consequently, payment of rent on the 8th day of the month would be a breach of the contract of lease, entitling the landlord to cancel the contract. The fact that the delay was merely one day would be wholly irrelevant to the plaintiff's entitlement to cancel the contract. As soon as the rent is not paid by midnight on the 7th of the month, the landlord acquires the right of cancellation. Whether rent is then subsequently paid does not affect this legal position, except where the acceptance of the rent amounts to a waiver of the right of cancellation.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.