Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2010 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V POWER COACH EXPRESS (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
S V WESTGATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2002 (1) ZLR 12 (H)
DHLAMINI & ANOR V CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 25 (H)
MASUKU V CHINYEMBA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 31 (H)
S V K (A JUVENILE)
2010 (2) ZLR 35 (H)
CHINANZVAVANA & ORS V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2010 (2) ZLR 43 (H)
DUMBURA V MUHWEHWESA & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 62 (H)
PASIPANODYA NO V RUWIZHI NO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 78 (H)
KATSANDE V KATSANDE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
SHAH V AIR ZIMBABWE CORPORATION
2010 (2) ZLR 94 (H)
TIISO HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD V ZISCO
2010 (2) ZLR 100 (H)
HARRISON & HUGHSON (PVT) LTD V ALSTOM ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 114 (H)
S V MATAPO & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 120 (H)
HARRIS V HARRIS
2010 (2) ZLR 127 (S)
TACHIONA & ANOR V RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
2010 (2) ZLR 140 (H)
MAPLANKA V B A NCUBE HOLDINGS
2010 (2) ZLR 146 (H)
HUNGWE & ANOR V MAWEREZA
2010 (2) ZLR 154 (H)
CEDOR PARK FARM (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF STATE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 158 (H)
ZIMASCO (PVT) LTD V MARIKANO
2010 (2) ZLR 167 (H)
CHANAKIRA V MAPFUMO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 178 (H)
MUGUGU V POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 185 (H)
MOYO & ANOR V HASSBRO PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 194 (H)
MAFUSIRE V GREYLING & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 198 (H)
MCCOSH V PIONEER CORPORATION AFRICA LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 211 (H)
MUDEKUNYE & ORS V MUDEKUNYE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 225 (H)
MEKI V VHUSHANGWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 237 (H)
PEACOCK V STEYN
2010 (2) ZLR 254 (H)
MOHAMED V NOORMAHOMED & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 260 (H)
WILLIAMS V KATSANDE & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 266 (H)
ZCTU V OC POLICE, KWEKWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 277 (H)
AEPROMM RESOURCES (PVT) LTD V MAZOWE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 281 (H)
FIRST CLASS ENTERPRISES LTD V SCANLINK (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
LASAGNE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS V HIGHDON INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 296 (H)
MINISTER MINES & MINING DEVELOPMENT & ORS V AFRICAN CONSOL RESOURCES PLC & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 307 (H)
NYANDORO V MINISTER HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 332 (H)
SABLE CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD V EASTERBROOK
2010 (2) ZLR 342 (S)
MEREKI V FORRESTER EST (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 351 (H)
SAMUDZIMU V DAIRIBORD HOLDINGS LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 357 (H)
S V TIRIVANHU
2010 (2) ZLR 361 (H)
CHIKADAYA NO V CHENGA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 366 (H)
CEPRAT FARMING (PVT) LTD V BRIGHTLAND FARMING (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 383 (H)
MPOFU V COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 389 (H)
S V GARANEWAKO
2010 (2) ZLR 395 (H)
S V DUBE
2010 (2) ZLR 400 (H)
MABAIRE V JAILOSI & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 407 (H)
AGRICULTURAL BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V NICKSTATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 419 (H)
BRUFORD V ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 438 (H)
HUSAIHWVHU & ORS V UZ-USF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMME
2010 (2) ZLR 448 (H)
NGWENYA & ANOR V NDEBELE NO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 457 (H)
DUBE V OC ZRP, NKAYI DISTRICT, & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 462 (H)
VAN DEN BERG & ANOR V LANG
2010 (2) ZLR 469 (H)
MUSARIRI V MUTAVAYI & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 475 (H)
SIBANDA V GUMBO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 484 (H)
MUTYASIRA V GONYORA
2010 (2) ZLR 489 (H)
S V MASINA
2010 (2) ZLR 498 (H)
MUNHUMUTEMA V TAPAMBWA & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 509 (H)
PECHI INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V NYAMUDA
2010 (2) ZLR 516 (H)
S V MUPATSI
2010 (2) ZLR 529 (H)
S V THOMPSON
2010 (2) ZLR 535 (H)
RITENOTE PRINTERS (PVT) LTD V ADAM AND CO & ANOR
2010 (2) ZLR 544 (H)
WILLIAMS & ANOR V MSIPHA NO & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 552 (H)
COMMERCIAL FARMERS' UNION & ORS V MINISTER OF LANDS & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 576 (H)
TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V APPRECIATIVE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2010 (2) ZLR 598 (H)
VAN HOOGSTRATEN V JAMES & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 608 (H)
S V NKOMO
2010 (2) ZLR 613 (H)
GONDO & ORS V REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE
2010 (2) ZLR 618 (SADC)
TRUSTEES, LEONARD CHESHIRE HOMES ZIMBABWE CENTRAL TRUST V CHITE & ORS
2010 (2) ZLR 631 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

MCCOSH v PIONEER CORPORATION AFRICA LTD 2010 (2) ZLR 211 (H)

Case details
Citation
2010 (2) ZLR 211 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HH-164-10
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Kudya
Heard
14 July 2010;15 July 2010
Judgment
28 July 2010
Counsel
T Magwaliba, for the plaintiff/respondent. A Moyo, for the defendant/excipient.
Case Type
Civil trial
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Employment - contract - remuneration - agreement to pay employee in foreign currency - lawfulness of such agreement - requirement to pay employee in "legal tender "- meaning

▷ Words and phrases - "legal tender "-Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] -s 12A (1)

Headnote

The plaintiff had been employed by the defendant at a time before the general use of foreign currency became lawful. His contract expressed his salary in Zimbabwe currency, although later an acknowledgment of debt was issued by the defendant, expressed in foreign currency. The plaintiff claimed this sum from the defendant. It was argued, on the defendant's behalf, that the agreement to pay the plaintiff in foreign currency was unlawful, both under the Exchange Control legislation and under the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01], s 12A(1) of which requires employees to be paid in "legal tender".

Held, that an agreement to pay an employee in a foreign currency is not unlawful but, without the approval of the Reserve Bank, payment in a foreign currency would be unlawful.

Held, further, that s 12A (1) of the Labour Act restricts those employees who remunerate their employees in money to the use of "legal tender", to the exclusion of other modes of payment such as promissory notes, vouchers, coupons or any form other than legal tender. The phrase "any form other than legal tender" is of wide application. It restricts payment to the use of legal tender and excludes payment in kind or money that is not legal tender. Subsection(2) permits employers who are in occupations or industries that customarily pay remuneration in kind to do so. Section 12 A(2)(e) puts it beyond doubt that remuneration in kind is not the same as remuneration in money, and is clear proof that, in the mind of the legislature, legal tender in s 12A (1) was another name for "money". At that time, foreign currency did not constitute legal tender. Legal tender is the money of a country in actual use. It is such money in the legal sense as the legislature has so defined in the statutes organizing the monetary system and is the medium legally authorized by the State for the payment of debts. Foreign currency is not legal tender, for not all money is legal tender, but all legal tender is money. Legal tender is such money, as is the current "coin of the realm". At the time the acknowledgment of debt was entered into, the legal tender for the payment of salaries in Zimbabwe was local currency and not foreign currency.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.