Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
ROGERS v ROGERS & ANOR 2006 (2) ZLR 256 (H)
Practice and procedure — action — dismissal of — application for — allegation that action is "frivolous and vexatious" — test to be applied — need to show that plaintiff does not have an arguable case
Will — validity — undue influence on testator — what amounts to undue influence
Will — variation — application to vary provisions of will — general principles to be applied — save in exceptional circumstances or under statutory authority courts will not authorize a variation where the provisions of the will are capable of being carried out and not contrary to law or public policy
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.