Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2004 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V CHIKUNGURUSE
2004 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
AFRICAN TRIBUNE NEWSPAPERS (PVT) LTD & ORS V MEDIA & INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 7 (H)
TREDGOLD NO V NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
2004 (2) ZLR 28 (H)
GUMBO & ANOR V ZIMBABWE STOCK EXCHANGE
2004 (2) ZLR 42 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MAKAMBA
2004 (2) ZLR 63 (S)
MOYO V CHIPANDA
2004 (2) ZLR 67 (H)
MARIMO V MPOFU
2004 (2) ZLR 73 (H)
MOYO V MOYO
2004 (2) ZLR 77 (H)
S V MASUKU
2004 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MBEWE
2004 (2) ZLR 86 (H)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V CHIPININGU
2004 (2) ZLR 94 (S)
LATIF V LATIF
2004 (2) ZLR 102 (S)
COMMERCIAL UNION FIRE MARINE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS V CHINGWARU & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 106 (S)
DELTA OPERATIONS LTD V MPEPULA
2004 (2) ZLR 113 (S)
EX PARTE NDLOVU
2004 (2) ZLR 118 (H)
EVANS V SNAPPER
2004 (2) ZLR 121 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V MAHACHI
2004 (2) ZLR 126 (S)
IN RE HATIVAGONE & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 133 (S)
S V MUPAMBA & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 143 (S)
MATANHIRE V BP & SHELL MARKETING SERVICES (PVT) LTD
2004 (2) ZLR 147 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LIMITED V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2004 (2) ZLR 151 (H)
S V ZENDERE & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 165 (H)
MTEMERERWA & ANOR V TAWARWISA & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 172 (H)
COSMOS CELLULAR (PVT) LTD V POSTS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
2004 (2) ZLR 176 (S)
MAKWIRO PLATINUM MINES V PARADZAYI
2004 (2) ZLR 184 (S)
LEVER BROTHERS V BIMHA & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 188 (S)
LEE GROUP OF COMPANIES V ELDER
2004 (2) ZLR 193 (S)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK V CHINYEMBA
2004 (2) ZLR 197 (S)
CHIWADZA V MATANDA & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 203 (H)
S V TSVANGIRAI
2004 (2) ZLR 210 (S)
DOMBODZVUKU & ANOR V SITHOLE NO & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 242 (H)
BARCLAYS BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V NYAHUMA
2004 (2) ZLR 248 (S)
UNILEVER PLC & ANOR V VIMCO (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 253 (H)
MUSWERE V MAKANZA
2004 (2) ZLR 262 (H)
CHAWATAMA V UNITED TOURING COMPANY
2004 (2) ZLR 268 (S)
MVERE V TANGANDA TEA CO LTD
2004 (2) ZLR 271 (S)
NMB BANK LTD V SELEMANI
2004 (2) ZLR 279 (H)
DOMBOKA V MADHAMU
2004 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
QUINNELL V MINISTER OF LANDS & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 293 (S)
S V PARADZA
2004 (2) ZLR 324 (S)
PHIGIDEMAC CONSULTANTS (PVT) LTD V ZVIMBA RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL
2004 (2) ZLR 326 (S)
ZHAKATA V MANDOZO NO & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 335 (H)
MANDIKONZA & ANOR V CUTNAL TRADING (PVT) LTD & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 340 (H)
MASON V TIMORE TRADING SERVICES (PVT) LTD & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 347 (H)
POLARIS ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V ZAPCHEM DETERGENT MANUFACTURERS CC
2004 (2) ZLR 351 (S)
S V WILLIAMS & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 361 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

TREDGOLD NO v NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE 2004 (2) ZLR 28 (H)

Case details
Citation
2004 (2) ZLR 28 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HH-142-04
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Mungwira J
Heard
2 July 2001; 6 July 2001; 5 November 2001; 9 September 2003
Judgment
28 July 2004
Counsel
Miss E Mushore, for the plaintiff; E T Matinenga, for the defendant
Case Type
Civil trial
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Railways — negligence — public road crossing railway line — rights and duties of public and train driver — precedence given to train — speed at which train should approach crossing

Headnote

A young woman, who was represented by the plaintiff, her curator bonis, was seriously injured when her car was struck by a railway train. Due to traffic congestion, the car had stopped part of the way across the railway line. The driver of the train applied brakes but was unable to stop the train in time. The crossing was not protected by booms but there were various warning signs. The defendant applied for absolution from the instance. It is the duty of the traveller to look out for and wait for the train. At the same time, the train ought to give due warning of its approach when it is nearing a level crossing of this nature, so that persons might stop and allow the train to pass. The train should not to be travelling at such an excessive rate of speed that the warning it might give should be of no avail, but it is not expected to approach a level crossing at a speed which enables it to pull up short of the crossing. As no negligence had been established, absolution would be granted.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.