Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2004 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V CHIKUNGURUSE
2004 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
AFRICAN TRIBUNE NEWSPAPERS (PVT) LTD & ORS V MEDIA & INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 7 (H)
TREDGOLD NO V NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
2004 (2) ZLR 28 (H)
GUMBO & ANOR V ZIMBABWE STOCK EXCHANGE
2004 (2) ZLR 42 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MAKAMBA
2004 (2) ZLR 63 (S)
MOYO V CHIPANDA
2004 (2) ZLR 67 (H)
MARIMO V MPOFU
2004 (2) ZLR 73 (H)
MOYO V MOYO
2004 (2) ZLR 77 (H)
S V MASUKU
2004 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MBEWE
2004 (2) ZLR 86 (H)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V CHIPININGU
2004 (2) ZLR 94 (S)
LATIF V LATIF
2004 (2) ZLR 102 (S)
COMMERCIAL UNION FIRE MARINE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS V CHINGWARU & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 106 (S)
DELTA OPERATIONS LTD V MPEPULA
2004 (2) ZLR 113 (S)
EX PARTE NDLOVU
2004 (2) ZLR 118 (H)
EVANS V SNAPPER
2004 (2) ZLR 121 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V MAHACHI
2004 (2) ZLR 126 (S)
IN RE HATIVAGONE & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 133 (S)
S V MUPAMBA & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 143 (S)
MATANHIRE V BP & SHELL MARKETING SERVICES (PVT) LTD
2004 (2) ZLR 147 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LIMITED V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2004 (2) ZLR 151 (H)
S V ZENDERE & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 165 (H)
MTEMERERWA & ANOR V TAWARWISA & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 172 (H)
COSMOS CELLULAR (PVT) LTD V POSTS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
2004 (2) ZLR 176 (S)
MAKWIRO PLATINUM MINES V PARADZAYI
2004 (2) ZLR 184 (S)
LEVER BROTHERS V BIMHA & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 188 (S)
LEE GROUP OF COMPANIES V ELDER
2004 (2) ZLR 193 (S)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK V CHINYEMBA
2004 (2) ZLR 197 (S)
CHIWADZA V MATANDA & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 203 (H)
S V TSVANGIRAI
2004 (2) ZLR 210 (S)
DOMBODZVUKU & ANOR V SITHOLE NO & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 242 (H)
BARCLAYS BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V NYAHUMA
2004 (2) ZLR 248 (S)
UNILEVER PLC & ANOR V VIMCO (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 253 (H)
MUSWERE V MAKANZA
2004 (2) ZLR 262 (H)
CHAWATAMA V UNITED TOURING COMPANY
2004 (2) ZLR 268 (S)
MVERE V TANGANDA TEA CO LTD
2004 (2) ZLR 271 (S)
NMB BANK LTD V SELEMANI
2004 (2) ZLR 279 (H)
DOMBOKA V MADHAMU
2004 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
QUINNELL V MINISTER OF LANDS & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 293 (S)
S V PARADZA
2004 (2) ZLR 324 (S)
PHIGIDEMAC CONSULTANTS (PVT) LTD V ZVIMBA RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL
2004 (2) ZLR 326 (S)
ZHAKATA V MANDOZO NO & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 335 (H)
MANDIKONZA & ANOR V CUTNAL TRADING (PVT) LTD & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 340 (H)
MASON V TIMORE TRADING SERVICES (PVT) LTD & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 347 (H)
POLARIS ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V ZAPCHEM DETERGENT MANUFACTURERS CC
2004 (2) ZLR 351 (S)
S V WILLIAMS & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 361 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

MATANHIRE v BP & SHELL MARKETING SERVICES (PVT) LTD 2004 (2) ZLR 147 (S)

Case details
Citation
2004 (2) ZLR 147 (S)
Case No
Judgment S-113-04
Court
Supreme Court, Harare
Judge
Chidyausiku CJ, Ziyambi JA & Malaba JA
Heard
21 September 2004
Judgment
21 September 2004
Counsel
K Muskwe, for the appellant; W Ncube, for the respondent
Case Type
Civil appeal
Annotations
Link to case annotations

Flynote

c Appeal — notice of — requirement to state date of decision being appealed against — reason for — failure to state date — effect — notice incurably defective and incapable of being amended — appropriate procedure to follow

Headnote

Rule 7 of the Supreme Court (Miscellaneous Appeals and References) Rules 1975 provides that a notice of appeal against a judgment of the Labour Court or tribunal other than the High Court shall state, inter alia, the dateof the decision which is being appealed against. The purpose of requiring the date to be stated is to enable the respondent and the court to determine ex facie the notice of appeal whether the provisions of r 5 of the Rules, prescribing the time limit in which the appeal should be instituted and the notice of appeal delivered and filed, were complied with. Failure to comply with all the requirements of the rule renders the notice of appeal fatally defective and a nullity. It therefore cannot be amended. What needs to be done is to draw up a new notice of appeal complying with the requirements of r 7 and make an application for an extension of time within which to deliver and file the notice of appeal and for condonation for non-compliance with the Rules.

Costs de bonis propriis will be awarded against a lawyer as an exceptional measure and in order to penalize him for the conduct of the case where it has been conducted in a manner involving neglect or impropriety by himself (dicta per Gillespie J in Omarshah v Karasa 1996 (1) ZLR 584 (H) H at 591F followed).


Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.