Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2004 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V CHIKUNGURUSE
2004 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
AFRICAN TRIBUNE NEWSPAPERS (PVT) LTD & ORS V MEDIA & INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 7 (H)
TREDGOLD NO V NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
2004 (2) ZLR 28 (H)
GUMBO & ANOR V ZIMBABWE STOCK EXCHANGE
2004 (2) ZLR 42 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MAKAMBA
2004 (2) ZLR 63 (S)
MOYO V CHIPANDA
2004 (2) ZLR 67 (H)
MARIMO V MPOFU
2004 (2) ZLR 73 (H)
MOYO V MOYO
2004 (2) ZLR 77 (H)
S V MASUKU
2004 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MBEWE
2004 (2) ZLR 86 (H)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V CHIPININGU
2004 (2) ZLR 94 (S)
LATIF V LATIF
2004 (2) ZLR 102 (S)
COMMERCIAL UNION FIRE MARINE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS V CHINGWARU & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 106 (S)
DELTA OPERATIONS LTD V MPEPULA
2004 (2) ZLR 113 (S)
EX PARTE NDLOVU
2004 (2) ZLR 118 (H)
EVANS V SNAPPER
2004 (2) ZLR 121 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V MAHACHI
2004 (2) ZLR 126 (S)
IN RE HATIVAGONE & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 133 (S)
S V MUPAMBA & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 143 (S)
MATANHIRE V BP & SHELL MARKETING SERVICES (PVT) LTD
2004 (2) ZLR 147 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LIMITED V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2004 (2) ZLR 151 (H)
S V ZENDERE & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 165 (H)
MTEMERERWA & ANOR V TAWARWISA & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 172 (H)
COSMOS CELLULAR (PVT) LTD V POSTS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
2004 (2) ZLR 176 (S)
MAKWIRO PLATINUM MINES V PARADZAYI
2004 (2) ZLR 184 (S)
LEVER BROTHERS V BIMHA & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 188 (S)
LEE GROUP OF COMPANIES V ELDER
2004 (2) ZLR 193 (S)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK V CHINYEMBA
2004 (2) ZLR 197 (S)
CHIWADZA V MATANDA & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 203 (H)
S V TSVANGIRAI
2004 (2) ZLR 210 (S)
DOMBODZVUKU & ANOR V SITHOLE NO & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 242 (H)
BARCLAYS BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V NYAHUMA
2004 (2) ZLR 248 (S)
UNILEVER PLC & ANOR V VIMCO (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 253 (H)
MUSWERE V MAKANZA
2004 (2) ZLR 262 (H)
CHAWATAMA V UNITED TOURING COMPANY
2004 (2) ZLR 268 (S)
MVERE V TANGANDA TEA CO LTD
2004 (2) ZLR 271 (S)
NMB BANK LTD V SELEMANI
2004 (2) ZLR 279 (H)
DOMBOKA V MADHAMU
2004 (2) ZLR 287 (H)
QUINNELL V MINISTER OF LANDS & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 293 (S)
S V PARADZA
2004 (2) ZLR 324 (S)
PHIGIDEMAC CONSULTANTS (PVT) LTD V ZVIMBA RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL
2004 (2) ZLR 326 (S)
ZHAKATA V MANDOZO NO & ANOR
2004 (2) ZLR 335 (H)
MANDIKONZA & ANOR V CUTNAL TRADING (PVT) LTD & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 340 (H)
MASON V TIMORE TRADING SERVICES (PVT) LTD & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 347 (H)
POLARIS ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V ZAPCHEM DETERGENT MANUFACTURERS CC
2004 (2) ZLR 351 (S)
S V WILLIAMS & ORS
2004 (2) ZLR 361 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

S v MUPAMBA & ANOR 2004 (2) ZLR 143 (S)

Case details
Citation
2004 (2) ZLR 143 (S)
Case No
Judgment No. S-75-04
Court
Supreme Court, Harare
Judge
Sandura JA, Ziyambi JA and Gwaunza
Heard
14 September 2004
Judgment
14 September 2004
Counsel
Miss N P Goneso, for the appellants; R K Tokwe, for the respondent
Case Type
Criminal Appeal
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Military law ” court martial ” appeal against decision of ” to whom c appeal lies ” Court Martial Appeal Court ” composition of

Headnote

As a result of amendments to the Defence Act [Chapter 11:02], after 10 October 1997, any person intending to appeal against a judgment of a court martial is required to appeal to the Court Martial Appeal Court consisting of such judges of the High Court, not being less than two, as the Judge President of the High Court may from time to time appoint. An appeal therefrom lies to the Supreme Court, in all respects as though it were a decision of the High Court.

As the appeal, in casu, was not in conformity with the Defence Act [Chapter 11:02], as amended by Part XIII of the Schedule to the E Magistrates Court Amendment Act 1997 (Act 9 of 1997), it was not properly before the Supreme Court and had to be struck off the roll.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.