Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 18 — right to protection of the law — law creating offence of strict liability for publishing false information — too broad in effect
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 20 — right to receive and impart information without interference — requirement for journalists to be accredited — not a contravention of section if criteria and qualifications for accreditation not too onerous — entitlement of person to be accredited if criteria met
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 20 — right to receive and impart information without interference — entitlement of Media and Information Commission to be party to drawing up of code of conduct for journalists and to enforce such code — not a restriction on rights protected by s 20
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 20 — right to receive and impart information without interference — law making it an offence for journalist to collect or disseminate information without the permission of his employer — too vague in objective — not constitutional
Statutes — Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act [Chapter 10:27] — ss 79, 80, 83 and 85 — constitutionality of sections
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.