Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

1992 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

VARETA V VARETA & ORS
1992 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
IN RE MASENDEKE
1992 (2) ZLR 5 (S)
S V MASIWA
1992 (2) ZLR 7 (S)
EDWARDS V CHIZEMA
1992 (2) ZLR 14 (S)
S V KAPURIRA
1992 (2) ZLR 17 (S)
BOADI V BOADI & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 22 (H)
GOMBA V MAKWARIMBA
1992 (2) ZLR 26 (S)
MUNYAI V CHIKASHA
1992 (2) ZLR 31 (S)
SEVA & ORS V DZUDA
1992 (2) ZLR 34 (S)
S V CHAITEZVI
1992 (2) ZLR 38 (S)
CHIMHOSVA & ORS V VICE-CHANCELLOR (UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE) & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 45 (H)
ROTHMANS OF PALL MALL (ZIMBABWE) LIMITED V JACKSON
1992 (2) ZLR 50 (H)
VUNDU V COMMISSIONER OF TAXES
1992 (2) ZLR 59 (H)
S V MUSHAYANDEBVU
1992 (2) ZLR 62 (S)
S V MPOFU
1992 (2) ZLR 68 (H)
CARINUS V DU TOIT
1992 (2) ZLR 71 (H)
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HARARE & ANOR V MAGAMA & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 75 (S)
S V AITKEN
1992 (2) ZLR 84 (S)
MANDUNA V MUTIZWA
1992 (2) ZLR 90 (S)
MAVROS V PACHYDAKIS
1992 (2) ZLR 94 (S)
S V MTOMBENI
1992 (2) ZLR 104 (S)
S V SITHOLE
1992 (2) ZLR 110 (H)
S V KEARNS
1992 (2) ZLR 116 (S)
S V STOUYANNIDES
1992 (2) ZLR 126 (S)
SHAW V SHAW & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 134 (S)
GOUS V THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
1992 (2) ZLR 142 (H)
CHIPFUYAMITI V NYAJINA & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 148 (H)
S V JUMBE
1992 (2) ZLR 153 (H)
S V MLAMBO
1992 (2) ZLR 156 (S)
S V CHARUMA
1992 (2) ZLR 162 (H)
TOFF'S RESTAURANT (PVT) LTD V PROMAVEN PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD
1992 (2) ZLR 164 (S)
CONJWAYO & ORS V MNANGAGWA & ORS
1992 (2) ZLR 171 (H)
CHIOMBA V CHIOMBA
1992 (2) ZLR 197 (S)
S V SHAVA
1992 (2) ZLR 204 (H)
S V CHIGOVA
1992 (2) ZLR 206 (H)
S V MUNEMO
1992 (2) ZLR 222 (S)
S V MOYO
1992 (2) ZLR 228 (S)
S V NDHLOVU
1992 (2) ZLR 231 (S)
S V NEMUTENZI
1992 (2) ZLR 233 (H)
MATANGI V KUMBULA & ORS
1992 (2) ZLR 241 (H)
DEAN & ANOR V CHRISTEN
1992 (2) ZLR 248 (H)
CITY OF HARARE V D & P INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 254 (S)
IN RE NDIMANDE - ATTORNEY V GENERAL V NDIMANDE
1992 (2) ZLR 259 (S)
HAYNES V MINISTER OF DEFENCE & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 262 (H)
CHAIRMAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANOR V HALL
1992 (2) ZLR 271 (S)
S V CHIPERE
1992 (2) ZLR 276 (S)
S V MUKWEZVA
1992 (2) ZLR 283 (S)
BANGANI V MUFWO & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 290 (S)
PRAKASH V WILSON & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 294 (S)
FELDMAN V MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS
1992 (2) ZLR 304 (S)
MUZABAZI V JAMBAWU & ORS
1992 (2) ZLR 314 (H)
MUJAWO V CHOGUGUDZA
1992 (2) ZLR 321 (S)
S V LIVER
1992 (2) ZLR 323 (H)
GURURE V RUSIKE
1992 (2) ZLR 334 (H)
S V DUBE
1992 (2) ZLR 338 (S)
HORA V TAFAMBA
1992 (2) ZLR 348 (S)
KNOWER V MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS & ANCHOR
1992 (2) ZLR 356 (S)
S V MUBAIWA & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 362 (S)
BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V AIR ZIMBABWE CORPORATION
1992 (2) ZLR 377 (H)
S V RAMOTALE
1992 (2) ZLR 397 (S)
GUMBO V NORTON-SELOUS RURAL COUNCIL
1992 (2) ZLR 403 (S)
RITCHIE V DELTA PENSION FUND
1992 (2) ZLR 413 (S)
ZIJENA V MAPHOSA
1992 (2) ZLR 423 (S)
MHLANGA V MTENENGARI & ANOR
1992 (2) ZLR 431 (S)
S V SIBANDA
1992 (2) ZLR 438 (S)
PEDZISA V CHIKONYORA
1992 (2) ZLR 445 (S)
SAVANHU V POSTMASTER-GENERAL
1992 (2) ZLR 455 (H)
S V AITKEN
1992 (2) ZLR 463 (S)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD v AIR ZIMBABWE CORPORATION 1992 (2) ZLR 377 (H)

Case details
Citation
1992 (2) ZLR 377 (H)
Case No
Details not supplied
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Adam J
Heard
18 May 1992
Judgment
25 November 1992
Counsel
DP Carter, for the plaintiff. AP de Bourbon SC, JB Colegrave, for the defendant.
Case Type
Civil action
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Carriage of goods — by air — extent of liability of carrier for missing goods

Headnote

Two gold bars were stolen at Harare airport by security officials employed by the defendant. These security officials were responsible for unloading and safeguarding the consignment of gold at Harare Airport. The two gold bars were part of a consignment of gold carried on a domestic flight from Bulawayo to Harare by the defendant corporation on behalf of the plaintiff. The contractual terms of the carriage were contained in a waybill which was signed by or on behalf of the plaintiff. This waybill made the carriage contract subject to the limitations on liability laid down by the Warsaw Convention. In terms of Article 29 of that Convention, the right of the person whose goods are being carried to claim delictual damages is extinguished if the action is not brought within two years, when the cargo arrived or should have arrived. Article 22 limits the liability for loss of cargo to 250 francs per kilogram.

One of the stolen gold bars was subsequently recovered but the other was not. The plaintiff claimed from the defendant $61970,23. This was the value of one gold bar, less what it had been able to recover of the proceeds of the sale of some of the stolen gold.

Held, that the Warsaw Convention governed the contract of carriage.

Held, further, that although the security officials had been acting in the course of their employment when they committed the theft, the plaintiff's delictual claim had been extinguished as a result of its failure to bring the claim within two years as required by Article 29 of the Warsaw Convention.

Held, further, that the defendant had done nothing which would estop it from relying on the defence that the delictual claim had been extinguished under Article 29 of the Warsaw Convention.

Held, further, that the plaintiff was only entitled to recover compensation for the lost gold at the gold value rate specified in Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention, namely 250 francs per kilogram. This gold value was to be ascertained in accordance with the standard or weight and fineness specified in Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention. Every gram or fraction of a gram of such ascertained gold value must be treated as representing the price of gold bullion set by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe in dollars on the date of Judgment.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.