Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

1982 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

S V SIBANDA
1982 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
COWAN AND OTHERS V REGISTRAR OF NAMES, UNIFORMS, BADGES AND HERALDIC REPRESENTATIONS
1982 (2) ZLR 6 (S)
S V NEMAPARE
1982 (2) ZLR 10 (S)
S V CHIRARA
1982 (2) ZLR 19 (H)
S V FRANCIS
1982 (2) ZLR 21 (H)
KUNZ V PRETORIUS
1982 (2) ZLR 24 (H)
HOLLAND V COMMISSIONER OF THE ZIMBABWE REPUBLIC POLICE
1982 (2) ZLR 29 (H)
EX PARTE BURNETT
1982 (2) ZLR 37 (H)
S V MADONDO
1982 (2) ZLR 44 (S)
MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ANOTHER V YORK AND ANOTHER
1982 (2) ZLR 48 (S)
F V COMMISSIONER OF TAXES
1982 (2) ZLR 60 (S)
S V PASIPANODYA
1982 (2) ZLR 69 (H)
MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE CO V ADDISON, NO
1982 (2) ZLR 73 (S)
PATEL V CONTROLLER OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE
1982 (2) ZLR 82 (H)
S V CHITSINDE
1982 (2) ZLR 91 (S)
BRYCE HENDRIE NO V ASSISTANT MASTER
1982 (2) ZLR 102 (H)
S V APPLETON
1982 (2) ZLR 110 (S)
WILLIAMS V THE TAXING MASTER
1982 (2) ZLR 122 (H)
S V MUSARURWA
1982 (2) ZLR 130 (H)
S V PANDEHUNI
1982 (2) ZLR 133 (S)
S V RHOTAN (PVT) LTD
1982 (2) ZLR 137 (S)
SADOMBA V FARAI UZUMBA (PVT) LTD
1982 (2) ZLR 142 (H)
COMMERCIAL GRAIN PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION V TOBACCO SALES LTD
1982 (2) ZLR 154 (S)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V CHAGWIZA ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MATAMBO ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MUKONDO
1982 (2) ZLR 165 (S)
S V MLILO
1982 (2) ZLR 175 (S)
S V RUREDZO
1982 (2) ZLR 181 (S)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V NURMAHOMED
1982 (2) ZLR 194 (S)
S V NYATHI
1982 (2) ZLR 197 (H)
S V MAROMWE
1982 (2) ZLR 200 (H)
S V A JUVENILE
1982 (2) ZLR 201 (H)
DIESEL ELECTRIC (SALISBURY) (PVT) LTD V S & T IMPORT AND EXPORT (PVT) LTD
1982 (2) ZLR 204 (H)
S V JAMBANI
1982 (2) ZLR 213 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V CHIMWADZE
1982 (2) ZLR 218 (S)
S V RAWSTRON
1982 (2) ZLR 221 (H)
S V MACEYS OF SALISBURY LTD
1982 (2) ZLR 239 (S)
S V JOVNER
1982 (2) ZLR 252 (S)
S V PIVISAYI
1982 (2) ZLR 260 (H)
JEPHCOTT V VAGHMARIA
1982 (2) ZLR 263 (H)
S V HOLMES
1982 (2) ZLR 267 (H)
S V JAMBA
1982 (2) ZLR 273 (S)
S V TWO JUVENILES
1982 (2) ZLR 275 (H)
IN RE PETITION OF STANDARD TRUST LIMITED
1982 (2) ZLR 279 (H)
S V GARDENER
1982 (2) ZLR 290 (S)
PRACTICE NOTE NO. 1 OF 1982
1982 (2) ZLR 302 (H)
S V PEARCE
1982 (2) ZLR 303 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

KUNZ v PRETORIUS 1982 (2) ZLR 24 (H)

Case details
Citation
1982 (2) ZLR 24 (H)
Case No
Details not supplied
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
McNally J
Heard
16th June, 1982
Judgment
21st July, 1982
Counsel
Details not supplied
Case Type
Details not supplied
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Parent and child — custody — awarded to mother following divorce — child c then by order of Juvenile Court placed in a home as a child in need of care — subsequent application to High Court for custody to be awarded to father — not proper for High Court to make order in conflict with that of Juvenile Court — custody awarded to father, subject to provisions of order of Juvenile Court.

Headnote

The plaintiff and defendant were formerly husband and wife and parents of a child. On their divorce the custody of the child was awarded to the defendant, the child's mother. Because of her subsequent mental and emotional problems, the child (and two other children of hers by a previous marriage) were by order of the Juvenile Court placed in a home, as e children In need of care. The plaintiff wished custody to be awarded to him, the evidence clearly supporting his claim, and the question arose as to what the correct procedure should be, there being in effect an order of the Juvenile Court placing the child in the custody off the person in charge of the home.

Held, that the question was not one of which Court was the senior, but which course was more conducive to stability of administration. It was undesirable, indeed wrong, to interfere with an order of the Juvenile Court and the best course would be to award custody to the plaintiff father, subject to the Juvenile Court order presently in force.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.