Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2014 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

DAMSON V USHAMBA
2014 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
S V CHIKWASHIRA
2014 (2) ZLR 10 (H)
MATANHIRE & ANOR V CHAPENDAMA & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 15 (H)
ROCK CHEMICAL FILLERS (PVT) LTD V BRIDGE RESOURCES (PVT) LTD & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 30 (H)
TRUSTEES, SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION OF ZIMBABWE V BINDURA UNIVERSITY & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 36 (H)
ZIMBABWE LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS V MINISTER OF TRANSPORT & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 44 (H)
MASENDEKE V CHALIMBA & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 63 (H)
CHIMAKURE & ORS V A-G
2014 (2) ZLR 74 (CC)
MAYOR LOGISTICS (PVT) LTD V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2014 (2) ZLR 78 (CC)
PILIME & ORS V MIDRIVER ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 91 (H)
WINDSOR TECHNOLOGY (PVT) LTD V MABUYAWA & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 96 (H)
RUZENGWE NO & ORS V ZVINAVASHE
2014 (2) ZLR 104 (H)
S V MUKWAMBUWE
2014 (2) ZLR 115 (H)
MADHATTER MINING COMPANY V TAPFUMA
2014 (2) ZLR 125 (S)
S V MUTERO & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 139 (H)
COME AGAIN MINES (PVT) LTD V PARKS AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 161 (H)
S V NCUBE & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 174 (S)
MOYO V NKOMO (TSHOLOTSHO NORTH ELECTION PETITION APPEAL)
2014 (2) ZLR 185 (S)
SUPERBAKE BAKERIES (PVT) LTD V RUMTOWERS SECURITY (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 191 (S)
S V NDZOMBANE
2014 (2) ZLR 197 (S)
CHIHOTA V MUNYARIWA & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 206 (H)
OKEY V CHIEF IMMIGRATION OFFICER & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 210 (H)
S V MUSUMHIRI
2014 (2) ZLR 223 (H)
NYAMHUKA & ANOR V MAPINGURE
2014 (2) ZLR 229 (H)
S V MASEKO & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 240 (H)
GUARDIAN SECURITY (PVT) LTD V GLOBAL INSURANCE (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 244 (H)
S V WEALE & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 252 (H)
S V CHINGURUME
2014 (2) ZLR 260 (H)
MUPAPA V MANDEYA
2014 (2) ZLR 267 (H)
S V HALL
2014 (2) ZLR 278 (H)
BANGA & ANOR V ZAWA & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 288 (H)
S V NCUBE
2014 (2) ZLR 297 (H)
MPOFU V DELTA BEVERAGES (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 305 (H)
NCUBE V DUBE
2014 (2) ZLR 310 (H)
RITENOTE PRINTERS (PVT) LTD & ANOR V A ADAM & CO (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 314 (H)
AIR ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD & ANOR V NHUTA & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 333 (S)
B (A JUVENILE) V MINISTER OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AND OTHERS
2014 (2) ZLR 341 (H)
SAGANDIRA V MAKONI RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL
2014 (2) ZLR 356 (S)
JAMBGA V ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES
2014 (2) ZLR 365 (H)
MASHONGANYIKA & ANOR V PFUTE & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 382 (H)
DEPUTY SHERIFF HARARE V KINGSLEY & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 394 (H)
MANGENJE V TBIC INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 401 (H)
S V MUMPANDE & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 417 (H)
S V MUKANDI & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 422 (CC)
MUSIYIWA V SHOMET INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 437 (H)
MUTSINZE V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2014 (2) ZLR 443 (CC)
ZIMBEVA V KINGDOM BANK LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 461 (H)
DZOMONDA & ORS V CHIPANDA & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 473 (H)
NANHANGA V CHALMERS & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 486 (H)
TAYLOR-FREEME V SENIOR MAGISTRATE, CHINHOYI & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 498 (CC)
AFRICAN BANKING CORPORATION OF ZIMBABWE LTD V PFUMOJENA
2014 (2) ZLR 514 (H)
S V MEIKLE
2014 (2) ZLR 526 (H)
S V MTETWA
2014 (2) ZLR 533 (H)
S V GUMBURA
2014 (2) ZLR 539 (S)
DHL INTERNATIONAL (PVT) LTD V TINOFIREYI
2014 (2) ZLR 546 (S)
S V JOCHOMA
2014 (2) ZLR 553 (H)
S V MUPFUMBURI
2014 (2) ZLR 560 (H)
Z (PVT) LTD V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2014 (2) ZLR 568 (H)
S (PVT) LTD V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2014 (2) ZLR 580 (H)
FBC BANK LTD V DUNLETH ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 595 (H)
MHLANGA V MHLANGA
2014 (2) ZLR 601 (H)
NYAHORA V CFI HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 607 (S)
DELTA BEVERAGES (PVT) LTD V CHIMURIWO & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 616 (H)
SMETHWICK TRADING (PVT) LTD & ANOR V ROME FURNITURE (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 627 (H)
S V SENGEREDO
2014 (2) ZLR 633 (CC)
BT (PVT) LTD V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2014 (2) ZLR 640 (H)
DERDALE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 662 (H)
KAMURUKO V MAPIMBIRO & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 677 (H)
NEC, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY V ZIMBABWE NANTONG INTERNATIONAL (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 681 (H)
SHERIFF & ORS V DUBE & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 688 (H)
ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD V POSTAL & TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ZIMBABWE
2014 (2) ZLR 693 (H)
S V MANHENGA
2014 (2) ZLR 705 (H)
PREMIER TOBACCO AUCTION FLOORS (PVT) LTD V MESOENYAMA & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 710 (H)
RESERVE BANK OF ZIMBABWE V ROYAL BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 716 (H)
KM INSURANCE V MARUMAHOKO
2014 (2) ZLR 725 (H)
ZUVA PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD V MOTSI & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 728 (H)
MHETE & ORS V CITY OF HARARE & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 739 (H)
GUMBI V MAJONI
2014 (2) ZLR 749 (H)
TANYANYIWA V HUCHU
2014 (2) ZLR 758 (H)
FINWOOD INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR V TETRAD INVESTMENT BANK LTD & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 767 (H)
CARGO CARRIERS INTERNATIONAL HAULIERS (PVT) LTD V SHERENI & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 774 (H)
TOAKONA TRADING (PVT) LTD V VAN ROOYEN & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 781 (H)
MATIASHE V MAHWE NO & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 799 (S)
TICHAVANHU & ORS V OFFICER IN CHARGE, MORRIS DEPOT & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 810 (H)
REMO INVESTMENT BROKERS (PVT) LTD & ORS V SECURITIES COMMISSION OF ZIMBABWE
2014 (2) ZLR 817 (S)
CHIWESHE & ORS V AIR ZIMBABWE HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 837 (H)
SAKUNDA ENERGY (PVT) LTD V BAREP INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2014 (2) ZLR 847 (H)
CHATUKUTA V NLEYA NO & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 852 (H)
SHABTAI V BAR & ORS
2014 (2) ZLR 862 (H)
S V C (A JUVENILE)
2014 (2) ZLR 876 (H)
S V NYAMANDE
2014 (2) ZLR 888 (H)
PANDHARI LODGE (PVT) LTD V CABS & ANOR
2014 (2) ZLR 893 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

DEPUTY SHERIFF HARARE v KINGSLEY & ANOR 2014 (2) ZLR 394 (H)

Case details
Citation
2014 (2) ZLR 394 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HH-507-14
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Bere J
Heard
14 July 2011; CAV
Judgment
24 September 2014
Counsel
T Mpofu , for the claimant
L Uriri , for the judgment creditor
Case Type
Application for constitutional referral
Annotations
Link to case annotations

Flynote

Constitutional law — Declaration of Rights — referral of alleged breach to Constitutional Court — current legal framework sufficient to deal with concerns raised by applicant — application for referral refused

Family law — husband and wife — matrimonial property — matrimonial home — registration of in name of husband — not a bar to wife seeking D to claim ownership

Headnote

The sheriff had attached an immovable property registered in the name of the judgment debtor in this matter. The property, which was registered in the name of the judgment debtor, was the matrimonial home of the e judgment debtor and his estranged wife, the applicant. She was living at the property. Divorce proceedings were pending. She claimed a right to the property and the sheriff instituted interpleader proceedings. The applicant then sought to have the matter referred to the Constitutional Court on a number of grounds, including the right to protection of the law and protection against discrimination. Held, that the application was frivolous and vexatious. The current legal framework in this country is sufficient to deal with the applicant's concerns. While the law relating to the right of a wife to the matrimonial estate, as determined by the principles of family law, and the rights of her husband in the same property as determined by the principles of the s law of property has been described as unsatisfactory, there is a plethora of cases which show that the mere registration of a property in the name of a particular spouse is no bar to the court making an appropriate order contrary to such registration, as where, for example, it is shown that the information in the Deeds Office is not reflecting the correct situation as regards the actual ownership of the particular property.


The civil processes currently in force in this country could be invoked to ? protect the applicant's situation if she can demonstrate entitlement to the attached property. This could be achieved even through the filed interpleader proceedings.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.