Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2005 — Volume 1

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

PITCHFORD INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V MUZARI
2005 (1) ZLR 1 (H)
MUKUZE & ANOR V A-G
2005 (1) ZLR 6 (H)
S V SAMAKOMVA
2005 (1) ZLR 12 (H)
NHETE & ORS V MUDZI RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL
2005 (1) ZLR 20 (H)
N & B VENTURES (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 27 (H)
TAVENGWA V TAVENGWA & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 33 (H)
GANDA & ORS V FIRST MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY
2005 (1) ZLR 37 (H)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V MUSANHU
2005 (1) ZLR 43 (S)
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ZIMBABWE LTD V CHAPUKA
2005 (1) ZLR 52 (S)
PROTON BAKERY (PVT) LTD V TAKAENDESA
2005 (1) ZLR 60 (H)
TOTAL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V MOYANA
2005 (1) ZLR 65 (H)
THOMAS V COMMISSIONER OF WAR VICTIMS PENSIONS & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 72 (S)
S V MUKUZE & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 79 (H)
MAZODZE V MANGWANDA
2005 (1) ZLR 87 (H)
MAGUTA V CHIKUNICHAWA
2005 (1) ZLR 91 (H)
SIBANDA & ANOR V SIBANDA
2005 (1) ZLR 97 (H)
BEVERLEY BUILDING SOCIETY V RGWAFA
2005 (1) ZLR 108 (H)
ZIMBANK V INTERFIN MERCHANT BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD
2005 (1) ZLR 114 (H)
ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY AUTHORITY V SMITH & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 120 (H)
ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY AUTHORITY V ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES
2005 (1) ZLR 127 (H)
TEL-ONE (PVT) LTD V ZULU
2005 (1) ZLR 133 (H)
MATANHIRE V B P SHELL MARKETING SERVICES (PVT) LTD
2005 (1) ZLR 140 (H)
ZHOU V GLOBAL MOTORS & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 149 (H)
BENNETT V PARLIAMENT OF ZIMBABWE
2005 (1) ZLR 155 (H)
S V CHIYANGWA
2005 (1) ZLR 163 (H)
MADZINGO & ORS V MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 171 (H)
FRENKEN V CONTROLLER OF CUSTOMS
2005 (1) ZLR 186 (H)
MALABA V MALABA
2005 (1) ZLR 191 (H)
TRUST HOLDINGS LTD V TRUST BANK CORPORATION LTD & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 198 (H)
S V MANGENA & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 206 (H)
BENNETT V PARLIAMENT OF ZIMBABWE & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 210 (H)
ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS OF ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V MINISTER OF STATE FOR INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 222 (S)
BENNETT V CONSTITUENCY ELECTIONS OFFICER, CHIMANIMANI CONSTITUENCY & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 258 (E)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V STEYL & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 269 (S)
NET ONE CELLULAR (PVT) LTD V NET ONE EMPLOYEES & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 275 (S)
POSB V CHIMANIKIRE & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 285 (H)
S V KAJOKOTO
2005 (1) ZLR 292 (H)
SHUMBA V SHUMBA
2005 (1) ZLR 295 (H)
CHAFADA V EDGARS STORES LTD & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 299 (H)
FUYANA V MOYO & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 302 (H)
CHICHERA V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
2005 (1) ZLR 307 (S)
MAWERE V MINISTER OF JUSTICE
2005 (1) ZLR 317 (H)
TFS MANAGEMENT CO (PVT) LTD V GRASPEAK INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 333 (H)
NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE V ZIMBABWE RAILWAY ARTISANS' UNION & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 341 (S)
S V NDLOVU & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 349 (S)
OLIVINE INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD V JACK & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 356 (S)
S V SAFICO
2005 (1) ZLR 359 (S)
OMAR & ANOR V BLUE GUM TRANSPORT (PVT) LTD & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 363 (H)
APOSTOLIC FAITH MISSION OF PORTLAND, OREGON & ANOR V BALTZELL & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 368 (H)
DAIRIBOARD ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V LIGHTON TRADING (PVT) LTD
2005 (1) ZLR 375 (S)
NCUBE V NTOMBI
2005 (1) ZLR 380 (S)
TSVANGIRAI V REGISTRAR-GENERAL & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 382 (H)
JONASI-OGUNDIPE V CHIEF IMMIGRATION OFFICER & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 396 (S)
UNION METALLURGICAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES V SITHOLE & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 404 (H)
DULY HOLDINGS LTD V SPANERA
2005 (1) ZLR 407 (S)
REDSTAR WHOLESALERS V MUTOMBA
2005 (1) ZLR 411 (S)
WANG & ORS V RANCHOD NO & ANOR
2005 (1) ZLR 415 (H)
MASHOKO V MOBIL OIL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD
2005 (1) ZLR 421 (H)
ZIMTRADE V MAKAYA
2005 (1) ZLR 427 (H)
ZCTU V MAKONESE
2005 (1) ZLR 430 (S)
GOSA V MUJERI
2005 (1) ZLR 434 (H)
TEDCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES V CHIKWANDA
2005 (1) ZLR 439 (S)
S V NYAMBO
2005 (1) ZLR 443 (S)
HUNTING INDUSTRIES LIMITED V BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD & ORS
2005 (1) ZLR 447 (H)
MACKENZIE V RIO TINTO ZIMBABWE
2005 (1) ZLR 462 (S)
MATOPO INDIGENOUS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION V MATOPO RDC
2005 (1) ZLR 467 (H)
S V MHONA, S V MOYO
2005 (1) ZLR 472 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

DULY HOLDINGS LTD V SPANERA 2005 (1) ZLR 407 (S)

DULY HOLDINGS LTD v SPANERA 2005 (1) ZLR 407 (S)

Case details
Citation
2005 (1) ZLR 407 (S)
Case No
Judgment No. S-140-04
Court
Supreme Court
Judge
Chidyausiku CJ, Sandura JA & Ziyambi JA
Heard
23 November 2004
Judgment
13 June 2005
Counsel
R Y Phillips for the appellant
No appearance for the respondent
Case Type
Labour Appeal
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

C Employment — contract — termination — wrongful dismissal — damages for — how to be calculated — entitled only to compensation for period between date of dismissal and date when could be reasonably expected to have found alternative employment

The respondent was dismissed from his employment. Some five months later he found another job, at a lower salary. He left that job voluntarily about a year later. Subsequently the Labour Relations Tribunal found the dismissal to be unlawful, and ordered the respondent's reinstatement, or, failing reinstatement, damages. Ultimately the Labour Court (which had replaced the Tribunal) awarded damages calculated on his full pay, E allowances and benefits from date of dismissal to date of judgment less what he earned in the other job between February 2000 and March 2001. The employer appealed.

Held, he was entitled only to damages, calculated on the basis of his income, from the date of his dismissal to the date when he found employment.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.