Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
(1) GONDO & ANOR v SYFRETS MERCHANT BANK LTD (2) Sani Toilet Systems (Pvt) Ltd v Syfrets Merchant Bank (3) Syfrets Merchant Bank v Gondo & Anor (4) Syfrets Merchant Bank v Sani Toilet Systems (Pvt) Ltd 1997 (1) ZLR 201 (H)
Practice and procedure — judgment by consent — rescission — error common to both parties — subsequent case establishing rule of law which would have affected parties' decision not to oppose judgment — r 449 of High Court Rules — application of — need to establish that rule of law had in fact been broken — whether court should use common law power to rescind its own judgment
Interest — rate — the in duplum rule — debtors not opposing judgment because unaware of rule — seeking rescission of judgments on basis that would have defended claims had they been aware of in duplum rule
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.