Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

1989 — Volume 1

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

MUSWERE V MUSWERE
1989 (1) ZLR 1 (H)
KOZELUHOVA V HEALTH PROFESSIONS COUNCIL
1989 (1) ZLR 5 (H)
GRANT V EAGLE INSURANCE CO LTD
1989 (1) ZLR 19 (H)
S V LAWRENCE & ANOR
1989 (1) ZLR 29 (S)
SABAWU V HARARE WEST RURAL COUNCIL
1989 (1) ZLR 47 (H)
WHALEY & ORS (LAW SOCIETY OF ZIMBABWE INTERVENING) V CONE TEXTILES (PVT) LTD
1989 (1) ZLR 54 (S)
EAGLE INSURANCE CO LTD V MACHAKA
1989 (1) ZLR 73 (S)
MANGWANA V MPARADZI
1989 (1) ZLR 79 (S)
S V SNYMAN
1989 (1) ZLR 89 (S)
NYAKABAMBO V MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL & PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS & ORS
1989 (1) ZLR 96 (H)
RUZANE V PARADZAI & ANOR
1989 (1) ZLR 118 (H)
S V TAKAVARASHA
1989 (1) ZLR 133 (S)
ROYAL MUTUAL INSURANCE CO (PVT) LTD V MUBAIWA
1989 (1) ZLR 142 (H)
S V MANZINDE
1989 (1) ZLR 148 (S)
ARCHES (PVT) LTD V GUTHRIE HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD
1989 (1) ZLR 152 (H)
DONALD V DONALD
1989 (1) ZLR 160 (S)
STUMBLES & ROWE V MATTINSON; MATTINSON V STEPHENS & ORS
1989 (1) ZLR 172 (H)
GUTHRIE HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD V ARCHES (PVT) LTD
1989 (1) ZLR 184 (S)
S V BEAHAN (1)
1989 (1) ZLR 195 (H)
S V MAZORODZE
1989 (1) ZLR 218 (S)
UNION CARBIDE MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PVT) LTD & ANOR V CLUFF MINERAL EXPLORATION (ZIMBABWE) LTD & ORS
1989 (1) ZLR 224 (H)
S V CHARI
1989 (1) ZLR 231 (S)
S V PONDER
1989 (1) ZLR 235 (S)
S V BISSET
1989 (1) ZLR 245 (S)
LOGAN V MORRIS & ORS
1989 (1) ZLR 255 (H)
NDHLOVU V REGIONAL MAGISTRATE, EASTERN DIVISION & ANOR
1989 (1) ZLR 264 (H)
S V MUPAH
1989 (1) ZLR 279 (S)
MINISTER OF LABOUR, MANPOWER PLANNING & SOCIAL WELFARE & ORS V PEN TRANSPORT (PVT) LTD
1989 (1) ZLR 293 (S)
S V MADONDO
1989 (1) ZLR 300 (H)
ART CORPORATION LTD V MOYANA
1989 (1) ZLR 304 (S)
HOKONYA V DIRECTOR OF PRISONS & ANOR
1989 (1) ZLR 317 (H)
JAMES NORTH (ZIMBABWE) (PVT) LTD & ORS V MATTINSON
1989 (1) ZLR 322 (H)
COMMERCIAL CAREERS COLLEGE (1980) (PVT) LTD V JARVIS
1989 (1) ZLR 344 (S)
WORKER'S COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER & ANOR V UNITY INSURANCE CO LTD & ANOR
1989 (1) ZLR 352 (H)
S V BEAHAN (2)
1989 (1) ZLR 359 (H)
JECHE V MAHOVO
1989 (1) ZLR 364 (S)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

S v LAWRENCE & ANOR 1989 (1) ZLR 29 (S)

Case details
Citation
1989 (1) ZLR 29 (S)
Case No
Details not supplied
Court
Supreme Court, Harare
Judge
Dumbutshena CJ, Gubbay JA & McNally JA
Heard
22 November 1988
Judgment
27 January 1989
Counsel
A P de Bourbon SC, E Chatikobo, for the appellants. Y Omerjee, for the respondent.
Case Type
Criminal appeal
Annotations
Link to case annotations

Flynote

Criminal procedure (sentence) — bribery of public officer — businessman D bribing officer in Ministry of Trade and Commerce to circumvent import procedures — appropriate sentence.

Evidence — documentary — evidence in document relating to trade, business etc — Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 59] — s 262B(2) — need to prove that person supplying information is not available to give evidence.

Evidence — witness — accomplice — conviction on single evidence of — Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 59] — s 254 — requirements of — imperfections in accomplices's evidence — approach of court — accomplice offered remission of sentence in return for giving evidence in accordance with affidavit to police — dangers of such a course — need to inform court of inducement — court, not Attorney-General, should decide whether evidence satisfactory.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.