Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Criminal procedure — murder trial — plea of "not guilty" should be entered, irrespective of what accused says — accused convicted and sentenced to death without viva voce evidence being led — importance of viva voce evidence in murder trials to establish accused's intent.
In a murder trial, the established practice in Zimbabwe, which must be followed, is for the court to enter a plea of not guilty, even if the accused actually pleads guilty.
Where the trial court had entered a plea of not guilty, but had convicted the appellant of murder with actual intent, with no extenuating circumstances, and sentenced him to death on the basis of documentary admissions and a confession, without any viva voce evidence having been led at all, Held, that in the circumstances he had not had a fair trial and the conviction and sentence should be set aside, leaving the State to re-indict him if so advised.
Held, further, that it is of particular importance, in deciding the question of intention in murder cases, that the court should hear evidence.
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.