Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

1984 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

FAWCETT SECURITY ORGANIZATION V COMMERCIAL UNION FIRE, MARINE & GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
1984 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
S V DUBE
1984 (2) ZLR 10 (H)
S V GAVAZA
1984 (2) ZLR 13 (H)
S V PAWENI & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 16 (H)
PYRAMID MOTOR CORPORATION (PVT) LTD V ZIMBABWE BANKING CORPORATION
1984 (2) ZLR 29 (H)
PAWENI & ANOTHER V ATTORNEY-GENERAL
1984 (2) ZLR 39 (S)
BON MARCHÉ (PVT) LTD V BRAZIER & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 50 (S)
S V NHARI
1984 (2) ZLR 69 (S)
STEWART V CITY OF HARARE
1984 (2) ZLR 72 (H)
BARCLAYS BANK OF ZIMBABWE LTD V BINGA PRODUCTS PVT) LTD
1984 (2) ZLR 76 (S)
EX PARTE MTYENYOKA
1984 (2) ZLR 88 (H)
GRANGER V MINISTER OF STATE
1984 (2) ZLR 92 (S)
GORAH V MAHONA & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 102 (S)
KATEKWE V MUCHABAIWA
1984 (2) ZLR 112 (S)
S V WILSON
1984 (2) ZLR 129 (S)
S V TAYLOR
1984 (2) ZLR 135 (S)
V V A
1984 (2) ZLR 139 (S)
S V BEAULE
1984 (2) ZLR 145 (S)
LOURENCO V RAJA DRY CLEANERS & STEAM LAUNDRY (PVT) LTD
1984 (2) ZLR 151 (S)
NYEMBA V JENA
1984 (2) ZLR 169 (H)
TAVENGWA V MARINE CENTRE (PVT) LTD
1984 (2) ZLR 173 (H)
MAYISVA V COMMERCIAL UNION FIRE & GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 181 (H)
LAUBSCHER V NATIONAL FOODS
1984 (2) ZLR 195 (H)
ANGLO-AFRICAN SHIPPING CO (CA) (PVT) LTD V TRINITY ENGINEERING (PVT) LTD & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 199 (H)
PAAR & CO (PVT) LTD V SOUTH BRITISH INSURANCE CO LTD & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 209 (H)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V GAVAZA
1984 (2) ZLR 212 (S)
S V MELROSE
1984 (2) ZLR 217 (S)
NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE V COGHLAN, WELSH & GUEST
1984 (2) ZLR 224 (H)
HOSKING V CASLING & ANOTHER
1984 (2) ZLR 231 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

S v GAVAZA 1984 (2) ZLR 13 (H)

Case details
Citation
1984 (2) ZLR 13 (H)
Case No
Details not supplied
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Smith J
Heard
11 July 1984
Judgment
11 July 1984
Counsel
Details not supplied
Case Type
Details not supplied
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Criminal procedure — trial — plea — once accused has pleaded before a particular magistrate, entitled to a verdict from that magistrate — trial de nova before another magistrate not permissible unless original magistrate has died or recused himself- Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 59] — s 163(5).

Headnote

In terms of s 163(5) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 59] the accused, once he has pleaded, is entitled to a verdict from the court before which he has pleaded. There are exceptions provided by the Act itself. It is also permissible for the trial to be started de novo before another court in such circumstances as the death or recusal of the original judicial officer. In such an event, the proceedings should be commenced afresh: the charge should be put to the accused again and he should again plead to it. It would not be in order for the second judicial officer merely to confirm the original plea.

If the original judicial officer leaves the judicial service or becomes incapacitated for a lengthy period, the case should be referred to the High Court so that the proceedings can be set aside and the trial commenced de nova.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.