Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

2012 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

ANUEYIANGU V CHIEF IMMIGRATION OFFICER & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 1 (S)
S V KUROTWI & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 11 (H)
CHADOKA V CHOMBO NO & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 15 (H)
S V MUROMO & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 24 (H)
DOMBODZVUKA V CMED (PVT) LTD
2012 (2) ZLR 32 (S)
JONES V JONES
2012 (2) ZLR 39 (H)
NYONI & ORS V BOPSE LAND DEVELOPERS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 45 (H)
S V DAVID
2012 (2) ZLR 53 (H)
KINGDOM CALLS (PVT) LTD V SUNSEEKER (PVT) LTD
2012 (2) ZLR 56 (H)
ZETDC V RUHINGA (1)
2012 (2) ZLR 61 (H)
S V L S (A JUVENILE)
2012 (2) ZLR 70 (H)
S V MHAKO
2012 (2) ZLR 73 (H)
GUARD-ALERT (PVT) LTD V MUKWEKWEZEKE & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 83 (H)
KUTSANZIRA V MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT
2012 (2) ZLR 91 (H)
INDUSTRY PENSION FUND V UNITED REFINERIES LTD & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 98 (H)
MASUKU V DELTA BEVERAGES
2012 (2) ZLR 112 (H)
MASHAVIDZE V A-G & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 120 (H)
S V BABBAGE
2012 (2) ZLR 125 (H)
MINING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND V DAB MKTG (PVT) LTD
2012 (2) ZLR 132 (S)
MARANATHA FERROCHROME V NYEMBA
2012 (2) ZLR 145 (S)
SWIMMING POOL & UNDERWATER REPAIR (PVT) LTD & ORS V RUSHWAYA & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 151 (S)
CREMPTON TRADING (PVT) LTD V MATEKENYA
2012 (2) ZLR 161 (H)
PORTNET HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD V MALISENI
2012 (2) ZLR 168 (H)
NEHOWA V BAREP INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2012 (2) ZLR 176 (H)
VOTETI TRADING (PVT) LTD V HANCOCK & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 182 (H)
KARIMATSENGA V TSVANGIRAI & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 195 (H)
RUKUNI V MIN OF FINANCE & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 205 (H)
S V MAZANGWA
2012 (2) ZLR 219 (H)
TSVANGIRAI & ANOR V MUTEVEDZI NO & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 224 (H)
KATSANDE V GRANT
2012 (2) ZLR 231 (H)
S V CHUMA & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 237 (H)
MISI V ZIMBABWE NATIONAL ARMY
2012 (2) ZLR 241 (H)
S V TAPERA & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 246 (H)
SIBANDA & ANOR V OCHIENG & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 254 (H)
RUVINGA V ZETDC (2)
2012 (2) ZLR 276 (H)
SHEENA FLOWERS (PVT) LTD & ORS V COMMISSIONER-GENERAL, ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
2012 (2) ZLR 280 (H)
MDC & ANOR V MUDZUMWE & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 287 (S)
M M PRETORIUS (PVT) LTD & ORS V MUTYAMBIZI
2012 (2) ZLR 295 (S)
ZIMBABWE COMMERCIAL FARMERS' UNION V GAMBARA
2012 (2) ZLR 299 (H)
SANANGURA V ECONET WIRELESS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 304 (H)
THE PRESIDENT V BHEBHE & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 323 (H)
MPOFU V TEVESTRAND INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 329 (H)
HAMTEX INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD V KING
2012 (2) ZLR 334 (H)
MAGUWU V CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 346 (H)
KWARAMBA V BHUNU NO
2012 (2) ZLR 358 (S)
S V ISAAC
2012 (2) ZLR 369 (H)
JOHANNE V CLARION INSURANCE COMPANY & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 372 (H)
TRANSPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF ZIMBABWE V MINISTER OF TRANSPORT & ANOR
2012 (2) ZLR 378 (H)
WHITBY V WHITBY
2012 (2) ZLR 386 (H)
CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA V DIOCESAN TRUSTEES, HARARE DIOCESE
2012 (2) ZLR 392 (S)
MUGADZAWETA V CO-MINS OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 423 (H)
S V CHIGOGO
2012 (2) ZLR 429 (S)
MUTARISI V UNITED FAMILY INTERNATIONAL CHURCH
2012 (2) ZLR 434 (H)
S V MAZAMBANI
2012 (2) ZLR 444 (H)
PRIZE COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD V GOLDBERG & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 452 (H)
DAWSON & ANOR V NERRY INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
2012 (2) ZLR 467 (H)
MAPINGURE V MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 472 (H)
REDAN PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD V BIOLINE PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD & ORS
2012 (2) ZLR 483 (H)
S V CHIZHANGE
2012 (2) ZLR 489 (H)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

PRIZE COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD v GOLDBERG & ORS 2012 (2) ZLR 452 (H)

Case details
Citation
2012 (2) ZLR 452 (H)
Case No
Judgment No. HH-446-12
Court
High Court, Harare
Judge
Mathonsi J
Heard
30 October 2012; 31 October 2012; 1 November 2012; CAV
Judgment
5 December 2012
Counsel
E Chizikani , for the plaintiff.
L Mhundirwa , for the first, second and third defendants
D Halimani , for the fourth defendant
Case Type
Civil trial
Annotations
No case annotations to date

Flynote

Contract — sale — option — right of first refusal (pre-emption) — creation of — can only be created by contract or agreement between grantor and grantee — cannot arise in terms of a custom, convention or practice — nature of the right — undertaking by a grantor to offer the property at a price equal to that offered by another — sitting tenant of leased property — no custom or convention whereby such tenant has right of pre-emption

Headnote

"A right of pre-emption can only be created by a contract or agreement between the grantor and the grantee. Where breach of the right is alleged as a cause of action and its existence is denied, the onus is on the plaintiff to show that there was an agreement between the parties in terms of which the defendant undertook to offer him the property at a price equal to that offered by another." (dicta per Malaba JA in Eastview Gardens Residents Assn v Zimbabwe Reinsurance Corp Ltd & Ors 2002 (2) ZLR 543 (S) at 548G-H, followed).

A right of pre-emption or first refusal differs from an option by giving the holder the right to buy in priority to other prospective buyers if and when the seller decides to sell. The grantor of such a right cannot be compelled to sell the property concerned, but if he does sell, he is obliged to give the grantee the preference of purchasing and consequently he is prevented from selling to a third person without giving the first refusal. A right of pre-emption thus involves a negative contract not to sell the property to a third party without giving the grantee the first refusal; and the grantee has the correlative legal right against the grantor that he should not sell. This is a right which is enforceable by appropriate remedies. The right of pre-emption can only be created by contract or agreement between the grantor and the grantee. Where breach of the right is alleged as a cause of action and its existence is denied, the onus is on the plaintiff to show that there was an agreement between the parties in terms of which the defendant undertook to offer to him the property at a price equal to that offered by another. In the case of a leased property, a right of pre-emption can only be granted by the property owner and by agreement of the parties. In Zimbabwe there is no custom, convention or practice under which a plaintiff can claim the right of first refusal (or pre-emption) as a sitting tenant on a property to be sold.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.