Archive logo
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel
Archive logo
← Home

1991 — Volume 2

Cases

Select a case to view its details and legal content.

DOUGLAS V MEYERS
1991 (2) ZLR 1 (H)
HODGSON V GRANGER & ANOR
1991 (2) ZLR 10 (H)
SAVANHU V HEIRS ESTATE SAVANHU
1991 (2) ZLR 19 (S)
S V KAMANGA
1991 (2) ZLR 25 (H)
MCCRONE V SIBANDA
1991 (2) ZLR 28 (H)
CHIADZWA V PAULKNER
1991 (2) ZLR 33 (S)
HARRY V DIRECTOR OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE
1991 (2) ZLR 39 (H)
ANTONIO V ANTONIO
1991 (2) ZLR 42 (S)
S V ROFFEY
1991 (2) ZLR 47 (H)
S V STEAD
1991 (2) ZLR 54 (S)
ZIMBABWE DISTANCE (CORRESPONDENCE) EDUCATION COLLEGE (PVT) LTD V COMMERCIAL CAREERS COLLEGE (1980) (PVT) LTD
1991 (2) ZLR 61 (H)
S V MUGWENHE & ANOR
1991 (2) ZLR 66 (S)
MASASI V POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
1991 (2) ZLR 73 (H)
MOBIL OIL ZIMBABWE (PVT) LTD V CHISPITE SERVICE STATION (PVT) LTD
1991 (2) ZLR 82 (S)
S V BEAHAN
1991 (2) ZLR 98 (S)
CRUNDALL BROTHERS (PVT) LTD V LAZARUS NO & ANOR
1991 (2) ZLR 125 (S)
CARGO CARRIERS (PVT) LTD & ANOR V NETTLEFOLD & ANOR
1991 (2) ZLR 139 (S)
YOUNG V VAN RENSBURG
1991 (2) ZLR 149 (S)
MACHOKOTO V MABIKA
1991 (2) ZLR 159 (H)
L V COMMISSIONER OF TAXES
1991 (2) ZLR 164 (H)
DW HATTINGH & SONS (PVT) LTD V COLE NO
1991 (2) ZLR 176 (S)
AGRAMAC (PVT) LTD V CHISVO & ANOR
1991 (2) ZLR 185 (S)
S V HUSSEY
1991 (2) ZLR 187 (S)
MAGAMA & ANOR V TOWN CLERK OF CITY OF HARARE & ANOR
1991 (2) ZLR 194 (H)
MAYHEW V ALCOCK NO
1991 (2) ZLR 203 (S)
CHIBANDA V HEWLETT
1991 (2) ZLR 211 (H)
MUDEHWE V MUKONDOMI
1991 (2) ZLR 222 (S)
SATELLITE TELEVISION USERS ASSOCIATION V POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
1991 (2) ZLR 226 (H)
S V DELTA CONSOLIDATED (PVT) LTD & ORS
1991 (2) ZLR 234 (S)
MANGA V MANGA
1991 (2) ZLR 251 (S)
KATSUMBE V BUYANGA
1991 (2) ZLR 256 (H)
THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SOUTHERN AFRICA V SHIELD OF ZIMBABWE INSURANCE LTD
1991 (2) ZLR 261 (H)
MINISTER OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANOR V RAMHEWA
1991 (2) ZLR 270 (S)
ASHARIA V PATEL & ORS
1991 (2) ZLR 276 (S)
S V DU PLESSIS
1991 (2) ZLR 287 (S)
FAWCETT SECURITY OPERATIONS (PVT) LTD V OMAR ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD
1991 (2) ZLR 291 (S)
DRUMMOND V DE HAAST
1991 (2) ZLR 303 (S)
BOKA ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD V PINE
1991 (2) ZLR 308 (S)
REITH V ANTAO
1991 (2) ZLR 317 (S)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V MZIZI
1991 (2) ZLR 321 (S)
S V ADOLFO
1991 (2) ZLR 325 (H)
CLAN TRANSPORT CO (PVT) LTD V MHISHI
1991 (2) ZLR 333 (S)
IN RE MLAMBO
1991 (2) ZLR 339 (S)
COMMISSIONER OF TAXES V D
1991 (2) ZLR 357 (S)
© Zimbabwe Law Reports — 2026.
Home

Navigation

Browse

Search

Find a case in seconds

Close search modal

Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.

Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.

Try a starting point
Member access

Welcome back

Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.

Don't have an account?

Menu

Close panel

S V STEAD 1991 (2) ZLR 54 (S)

S v STEAD 1991 (2) ZLR 54 (S)

Case details
Citation
1991 (2) ZLR 54 (S)
Case No
Details not supplied
Court
Supreme Court, Harare
Judge
Gubbay CJ, McNally JA & Ebrahim JA
Heard
16 July 1991
Judgment
5 August 1991
Counsel
J B Colegrave, for appellant. Mrs J Zindi, for respondent.
Case Type
Criminal appeal
Annotations
Link to case annotations

Flynote

Employment — Labour Relations (General Conditions of Employment) (Termination of Employment) Regulations, 1985 — s 2(1) — criminal liability upon termination of employment — only attaches where there is employment.

Interpretation of statutes — penal provision — two constructions possible — more lenient construction to be adopted.

Company — lifting the corporate veil — when permissible — only when exceptional circumstances exist — rule applies even if company only has one member.

Sign in required

Continue beyond the preview

Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.