Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Practice and procedure — attachment to found jurisdiction — purpose of — D peregrinus — who is — whether person who was an incola when action commenced but has since left the jurisdiction is a peregrinus.
Founding and confirming jurisdiction is not the only purpose of attachment; a further object is to furnish an asset on which execution may be levied to satisfy the judgment which may be given in favour of the person E seeking attachment, so that the court's judgment will not be rendered nugatory.
Where the respondent was a resident of Zimbabwe before the action commenced but left permanently after the service of the summons, she could not for practical purposes be regarded as an incola and attachment of her property (or the deposit with her legal practitioners of a sum of F money equal to the value of the property) was necessary to confirm jurisdiction and to provide security for the judgment which might be given against her.
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.