Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Search by party name, citation, or a phrase from the judgment and move straight to the right volume.
Access noteResults only include content available on your current tier. If you do not have full case access, results from restricted case content will not appear.
Sign in to continue browsing Zimbabwe Law Reports.
Practice — interdict — against the Minister of Defence and Commander of the Air Force directing them to take all necessary steps within their powers to prevent any member of the Air Force from unlawfully detaining, arresting or assaulting the appellant.
In the circumstances which showed a reasonable apprehension on the part of the appellant that members of the Air Force were conspiring to do him harm and which indicated an attitude of cynical and callous indifference on the part of the respondent, the Commander and officers of the Air Force to the appellant's plight, the intervention of the law is justified to give to the appellant such protection as it can afford him against another ill-disciplined and unlawful invasion of his right to personal safety.
While the respondent, the Commander of the Air Force and his officers cannot be required to guarantee the safety of the appellant against unlawful molestation by members of the force acting contrary to discipline, it is appropriate to direct that they take all necessary steps to prevent such occurrence; which steps would include the identification and punishment of those responsible.
Sign in or create a free account — you get 2 full-case reads included.